Hello Cedric,
> Yes. That's the whole point of deployment descriptors (that and
> the fact that
> Java bytecode doesn't support metadata... I wish Java worked on the CLR,
> Microsoft definitely solved this problem)
Sure, but on the other hand, that is just a packaging issue/view ;) an EJB
JAR is nothing more than java bytecode and meta-data in XML descriptors
wrapped in a specific Java "executable": a JAR.
Do you really think it is so much different?
Furthermore, on this particular issue (10 different bean "types" but the
same remote/home/bean), I do not see why the CLR would add simplicity?
Maybe I am missing some evident point.
Cheers,
Sacha
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
