TX_REQUIRESNEW
-----Original Message-----
From: James Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Martes, 21 de Agosto de 2001 13:44
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Weblogic Transactions

Try posting your question to Weblogic support groups...they've got many...this is not one of them.
 
One thing that applies to EJB in general is that an entity bean should (must in 2.0) be called in the scope of a transaction. This does not mean only TX_REQUIRED, but may also be TX_MANDATORY or TX_WHAT'S_THAT_OTHER_ONE?.
 
jim
-----Original Message-----
From: A mailing list for Enterprise JavaBeans development [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Arkady Kasianski
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 1:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Weblogic Transactions

A consultant we hired to review our application code, told us that for the Weblogic beans to work correctly,we need all client calls to run under transaction. This means that all beans must be defined with TX_REQUIRED.He says that otherwise, the beans are not managed correctly by the Weblogic container. I need you What is Weblogic recommendation abot this ?

 

 


For your protection, this e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses.

Visit us at http://www.neoris.com/


Reply via email to