I'm not doubting you, but can you tell us how you came to the conclusion that the EJBHome stub is not thread-safe?
It's just that, if true, I have lots of code to rewrite (the Home-cache pattern is very popular) :( Thanks in advance. > -----Original Message----- > From: A mailing list for Enterprise JavaBeans development > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ian McCallion > Sent: 25 October 2001 15:11 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: EJBHome and thread safety > > > > Laurel Neustadter wrote: > > > > Hi Sanjeev: > > > > Isn't there a difference between a stub to the Home object > being thread-safe > > and the Home object itself being thread-safe? That is, the > latter doesn't > > imply the former. It seems the issue here is whether the stub > is thread-safe. > > You are correct. The actual EJBHome object on the server is not > important - > indeed, depending on the application server, there may be no > EJBHome class at > all. > > > ======================================== > Ian McCallion > Alexis Systems Limited > Romsey, UK > Tel: +44 1794 514883 > Fax: +44 1794 501692 > ======================================== > > ================================================================== > ========= > To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include > in the body > of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help". > =========================================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
