In my opinion also, the stmt "no conversational state" can be misleading if interpreted as "conversational state being wiped out for each call"
A question to guru's, could there be some other reason why SUN has used the stme "no conversational state" rather than "not guanranteed". -----Original Message----- From: Gavin Selvaratnam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 12:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: State in stateless session bean Hi, Thats just the case. Going through the EJB specifications I just couldnt get it that whats is ment when they say "Stateless session beans are session beans whose instances have no conversational state.". What I thought was that state is irased for each method invocation. But In the specification it doesnt tell you anywhere that "State is not garantied". Dont you think Sun should say those exat words when they describe stateless session beens ? I got to think about this only after doing a sample. Thanks, Gavin =========================================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Any unauthorised review, use, disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this email or any action taken in reliance on this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Visit us at http://www.cognizant.com
