Has anyone done any tests to prove that the EJB QL is faster than direct JDBC calls.
I have situation here that I would like to do a findAll on a table. I already use a local entity bean for that. Now the choice is that I shoot a sql to retrieve the records or do a findAll. Surprisingly I get better results with JDBC? Has anyone seen a different result ? Anish =========================================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
