Krishnan,
I expect that vendor <-> vendor interop will work out quite well, as the
CTS 1.3 was in my opinion very thorough in this area, as well as the fact
that the interoperathon effort (separate from CTS) has proven a reasonable
degree of interoperability between vendors.
Krishnan Subramanian wrote:
>>The answer is "EJB 2.0 Interoperability", that is assuming that
>>JBoss supports it.
>>
>
> Evan,
>
> What are your thoughts on EJB 2.0 Interoperability? From what I've heard,
> the CTS tests interoperability to a certain level(?) with the RI. But of
> course this might be quite different from vendor-to-vendor interoperability.
> (_Assuming_ transitivity: vendor A's product is interoperable with the RI,
> and vendor B's product is interoperable with the RI, therefore vendor A's
> and B's products are interoperable).
>
> In theory, everything would work as expected with all the fancy goodies
> you want, but I would be interested if anyone out there has actually
> managed to do this in practice.
>
> -krish
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> My thoughts only. Anyone with the same thoughts needs to have his/her
> head examined
>
>
>
--
_______________________________________________________________________________
Evan Ireland Sybase EAServer Engineering [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wellington, New Zealand +64 4 934-5856
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
