> From: A mailing list for Enterprise JavaBeans development > related to this is also the allowance to synchronously > receive JMS messages, and if my memory serves me correctly > there is mention somewhere of being careful not to wait too > long when doing so.... getting very close to Thread.sleep yes?
Yes, but then this is outside the scope of the specification: we're talking about the implementation of the bean now. The poster wanted their EJB to block for a while, if Thread.sleep() is not allowed, they will probably choose to have a busy for(;;) loop. -- Cedric =========================================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
