Agree on the *absolute* 100% portability. But for example,
my friend just finished an effort at a F500 company to move
their database infrastructure from Sybase, Microsoft, Oracle
to just Microsoft & Oracle and this was *not* trivial primarily
due to the large number of stored procedures. And in reference
to portability I didn't mean swapping container vendors. I meant
swapping the underlying database. If my app has no dependencies on SPs
then it will be easier to swap out the underlying data store.


>From: Nicholas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Why Ejb?
>Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 03:41:34 -0700
>
>100% portability is an illusion. Consider CMP and one
>must conclude that porting from one app server to
>another will come with a series of head aches
>regenerating all the proprietary extended descriptors.
>
>In this event, it could be argued that BMP offers a
>higher degree of portability, if not ease of use,
>since you have a higher degree of control over the
>actual SQL that is issued. Portability is in the eye
>of the porter.
>
>My point about SPs is that the Java code itself is
>better abstracted from the underlying database
>structure when it simply calls a CallableStatement and
>passes parameters. Admitedly, the downside is that the
>SPs themselves have to be regeneratred upon switching
>databases, but if you have anything like a serious
>application, and you are switching databases, that
>will the least of you worries.
>
>Anyways, I believe the trend is that medium to large
>sized companies (if not all companies) tend to have
>one standardized database (generally) for J2EE back
>ending, but they switch J2EE engines like they change
>their underwear.J2EE licenses are quite cheap compared
>to DB licenses.
>
>
>//Nicholas
>
>
>--- John Harby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But they aren't portable across database vendors so
> > if this
> > is an issue you should avoid stored procedures.
> >
> > I'm also not sure exactly what "ISOMORPHIC" means in
> > this
> > context. Actually the functionality of stored
> > procedures
> > would comprise a superset of the functionality of
> > plain SQL.
> > For example in Oracle take a look at DBMS_PIPE.
> >
> >
> > >From: Nicholas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >Subject: Re: Why Ejb?
> > >Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 14:02:44 -0700
> > >
> > >No No No !
> > >
> > >Does anyone on this list actually use stored
> > >procedures ?
> > >
> > >When you invoke a stored procedure, it participates
> > in
> > >the current transaction identically to a dynamic or
> > >embedded SQL statement. (Yes, you can mess it up by
> > >issuing a commit or a rollback in the SP, but that
> > >would be silly.) So, when you start a JTA managed
> > >transaction,  calls to stored procedures are still
> > >within the context of that transaction. They are
> > not
> > >subject to different rules.
> > >
> > >Moreover, the same goes for security (in most
> > >databases). SPs do not have any magic security
> > >override, except that users may have permission to
> > >issues SP requests, but not have access to the
> > >underlying tables/views/other SPs. This does not
> > >affect the security model in J2EE at all.
> > >
> > >My new mantra:  SQL ISOMORPHIC TO SP
> > >
> > >//Nicholas
> > >--- Ashwani Kalra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > You will have to use wrapper/facade in SLSB/SFSB
> > > > from which you can take
> > > > advanatage of the transactions and security. You
> > can
> > > > manage the transaction
> > > > in SPs also and propagate errors to the session
> > bean
> > > > methods.
> > > > Scalability issue will then shift to  session
> > beans.
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Vikram Naik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 3:46 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: Why Ejb?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >         Thanks for the quick reply...
> > > > >         Apart from getting generated SQL's
> > what
> > > > about the transactions
> > > > and
> > > > > scalability ????
> > > > >
> > > > > Vikram Naik
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: A mailing list for Enterprise JavaBeans
> > > > development
> > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > > > Ashwani Kalra
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 3:19 PM
> > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Subject: Re: Why Ejb?
> > > > >
> > > > > Two reasons :
> > > > > 1.EJB(cmp) makes code independent of the
> > Database.
> > > > > 2. You dont have to code sql queries for
> > > > inserting/updating etc.
> > > > >
> > > > > If you already have Sps then you can
> > completely
> > > > avoid Entity EJBs and use
> > > > > DAO to call SPs.
> > > > >
> > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > > > Cheers
> > > > > Ashwani Kalra
> > > > > http://www.geocities.com/ashwani_kalra/
> > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: "Vikram Naik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 3:22 PM
> > > > > Subject: Why Ejb?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hello All,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Why should we opt of EjBs when stored
> > procedures
> > > > can give us better
> > > > > > performance?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Your opinions will be highly appreciated.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks & Regards,
> > > > > > Vikram Naik
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
> >===========================================================================
> > > > > > To unsubscribe, send email to
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the
> > > > > body
> > > > > > of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST".  For
> > > > general help, send email to
> > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the
> > body of
> > > > the message "help".
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
> >===========================================================================
> > > > > To unsubscribe, send email to
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the
> > > > body
> > > > > of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST".  For
> > > > general help, send email to
> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
> > of
> > > > the message "help".
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
> >===========================================================================
> > > > > To unsubscribe, send email to
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the
> > > > body
> > > > > of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST".  For
> > > > general help, send email to
> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
> > of
> > > > the message "help".
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >===========================================================================
> > > > To unsubscribe, send email to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > and include in the body
> > > > of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST".  For
> > general
> > > > help, send email to
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of
> > the
> > > > message "help".
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >=====
> > >Nicholas Whitehead
> > >Home: (973) 377 9335
> > >Cell: (201) 615 2716
> > >Work: (212) 622 5639
> > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >__________________________________________________
> > >Do You Yahoo!?
> > >Yahoo! Autos - Get free new car price quotes
> > >http://autos.yahoo.com
> > >
> >
> >===========================================================================
> > >To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > and include in the body
> > >of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST".  For general
> > help, send email to
> > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of
> > the message "help".
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>_________________________________________________________________
> > Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device:
> > http://mobile.msn.com
> >
> >
>=== message truncated ===
>
>
>=====
>Nicholas Whitehead
>Home: (973) 377 9335
>Cell: (201) 615 2716
>Work: (212) 622 5639
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! Autos - Get free new car price quotes
>http://autos.yahoo.com
>
>===========================================================================
>To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
>of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST".  For general help, send email to
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".




_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com

===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST".  For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".

Reply via email to