Does it not compromise on the location transparency? And how does it works in the Cluster environment?
Thanks and Regards Saminathan. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ramakrishna N" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 11:41 AM Subject: Re: Reg Local Intreface in EJB 2.0 > Hi, > This look-up is not a remote method call as it happens for a remoteHome > lookup. So its a nice abstraction and a clearner way of implementation. > That's how all the verdors must be implementing it. > Have a nice day > regards, > kris > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vikram Naik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 2:34 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Reg Local Intreface in EJB 2.0 > > > Hello All, > > In Ejb2.0 we have LocalHome and Local-Component Interfaces, which > can reduce the unnecessary overhead of remote calls if the Ejbs are in same > JVM. I was just pondering on one thought .... > > If the Ejb's are in same JVM then Why LookUP ???? ... can't there be some > other mechanism to get the home object.... > > Thanks & Regards > Vikram Naik > > ==========================================================================To > unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body > of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help". > > =========================================================================== > To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body > of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help". =========================================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
