Dear All, According to my o'reilly book on page 437, which lists a number of commercial products and open source projects, Richard Monson-Raefel is the lead architect to ExOffice's OpenEJB server. According to the same page ExOffice's OpenEJB server can be found at www.exolab.org. I think the guy from the code foundary has looked up that page hence his information was out of date and incorrect. Why did he and the other two claim they know OpenEJB ? The one who knows OpenEjb pointed out that it is Apple who is conducting tests on OpenEjb and the changes will be incorprated in version 0.90.
According to the archives somebody has twenty five logs. Jini uses log files. The advice given by one of the Jini books is that one should delete the log files.These log files actually makes the services activitable. Why was somebody making these postings on EJB when they should be on Jini ? I am referring to when Zahid was around looking for a professional EJB server tool to do his work ? Why were the Indian company logged on then making negative remarks about his intellect when he was doing his work. Why were they asking him how do you clustering ? Does the same person goes around asking everyone in UK software houses how do you that and how do you this ? Why was the list administrator telling him to pick up a book when he got what he asked for. That being a commercial version of the EJBServer ? They were actually in the process of testing it. Does everyone goes around impersonating everybody else's account or was this individual targetted ? Is it true that people are only logged on these lines to find out what others are doing ? Something which is evident from the above. On each occasion somebody from Indian will claim they know it. Like the individuals described above even though Apple are the ones involved in testing the product and putting in the changes. If the commercial vendors wish to be paid for the product when used, then surely it is their responsibility to do their research and develop the products ? In which such cases the implementor can choose what ever product they wish to use ? Are some of these issues not the norm in IT development cycles ? Why should an end user give the benefit of his years of technical experts. Just so that a vendor implement the changes for free and charge the one he got his advice form ? -- __________________________________________________________ Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup =========================================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
