> EJB is an overhead since its actual features are rarely used and for the purpose > which we use EJB, we can always use some other things also.
Well, I'd love to hear what "some other thing" you could "always" use as a substitute for a Stateless Session Bean that can provide you with Transparent failover, Distributed deployment, QOS guarantees and inter-container portability. - Pramod -----Original Message----- From: Arora, Ashu(EM, GECIS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 3:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Is EJB an overhead Hi , Can anyone suggest on the debate going on, that EJB is an overhead since its actual features are rarely used and for the purpose which we use EJB,we can always use some other things also.Your opinion on this. Regards, Ashu > ========================= To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Any unauthorised review, use, disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this email or any action taken in reliance on this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Visit us at http://www.cognizant.com
