|
Hello,
Can you
please point out which part of the Ejb Specs lays down this
resctriction ... Is this issue addressed in the upcoming JSR 220 !! If
not, we should make it point for the expect group to remove this
restriction and support this behaviour in the upcoming releases of ejb specs.
what say ???
regards,
Vikram Naik
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 7:29
AM
Subject: Re: Reg Related Entities (CMP
2.0)
yups
the ejb's which are related should be in one jar file.
Hello,
Is it mandatory to have
related entities (.i.e. using CMR) in CMP 2.0 to be packaged in the same
ejb-jar !! I have a relationship (1:M) defined between two local
entity beans which are packaged in two different ejb-jars but same under
same J2EE application.
The application container (JBOSS in my case) is
not able to resolve the entities having relations packaged in different
jar.
TIA,
Vikram Naik
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of
the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
|
