Why not just

<prepend>
If you do not import blabla.blabla and import blablal.blabla... your work
does not fall under the heading of derived work.
</prepend>

?

Anh

----------  Forwarded Message  ----------
Subject: Re: GPL prepend Re: Misleading info about the GPL?
Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 09:05:47 +0200
From: Rickard �berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


marc fleury wrote:
> the rest of the board is shnoozing in Europe so we can take them by
> speed Dan ;-)

I'm up :-)

> Ok how about the following wording
> 
> <prepend>
> NOTE! This copyright does *not* cover user programs that use container
> services through J2EE (TM) defined standard calls - this is merely
> considered normal use of the container, and does *not* fall under the
> heading of "derived work".
> </prepend>
> 
> Of course +1 on me.
> majority wins (3/5)

+1

/R

-- 
Rickard �berg

@home: +46 13 177937
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.telkel.com
http://www.ejboss.org
http://www.dreambean.com


--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------------


--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to