Thanks for the clarification Mark On Tuesday, February 4, 2014 9:04:43 AM UTC+2, Mark Walkom wrote: > > The *easiest* is to do an upgrade directly to v1.0, but I highly doubt if > that will even work after the upgrade due to the number of changes between > 0.2X, 0.90.X and 1.0.0. > And frankly, you'd be insane to consider it if you wanted to keep your > data. > > If you can export your data to disk, then reimport/reindex it, that might > be an easier option for you. > > Regards, > Mark Walkom > > Infrastructure Engineer > Campaign Monitor > email: ma...@campaignmonitor.com <javascript:> > web: www.campaignmonitor.com > > > On 4 February 2014 17:20, GX <mail...@gmail.com <javascript:>> wrote: > >> Hi Mark >> >> Thanks for the seedy reply, I was not thinking of an immediate upgrade >> since it needs to be scheduled tested etc, but rather considering skipping >> 90 since 1.0 is so close to release and doing a one step upgrade instead of >> a 2 step so rather than do an upgrade now then again in a few months just >> go strait for 1.0 when its final release is out, my main concern is if its >> possible to skip 90 in production, of course testing will be done however >> it never matches to real word circumstances since replicating a test >> environment with 4 nodes and gigabytes of data may in theory be possible >> but actual load and results are difficult do. >> I suppose in the extreme case we can just do a fresh install of 1.0 and >> reindex all the data it just means several hours of 'downtime' >> >> so I guess the real question is which route is easiest as opposed to >> safest >> 0.20 -> 0.90 -> 1.0 >> 0.20 -> 1.0 >> nuke and pave strait to 1.0 >> >> GX >> >> On Tuesday, February 4, 2014 7:42:11 AM UTC+2, Mark Walkom wrote: >>> >>> You will probably want to upgrade to 0.90.0 first. >>> v1.0 is still RC so if this is production you might want to hold off. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Mark Walkom >>> >>> Infrastructure Engineer >>> Campaign Monitor >>> email: ma...@campaignmonitor.com >>> web: www.campaignmonitor.com >>> >>> >>> On 4 February 2014 16:21, GX <mail...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi All >>>> >>>> it seems I have been slacking on keeping up do date with updates, will >>>> it be possible to upgrade a 0.22.1 cluster to 1.0 or is it better to do it >>>> in two steps i.e. 0.90.x first >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> GX >>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "elasticsearch" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to elasticsearc...@googlegroups.com. >>>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ >>>> msgid/elasticsearch/745d1173-2045-4c69-83fc-95e9e078873c% >>>> 40googlegroups.com. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>>> >>> >>> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "elasticsearch" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to elasticsearc...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/eb82d6a6-dc7f-489d-859b-31e712891a2e%40googlegroups.com >> . >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> > >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elasticsearch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/f356527b-239c-4bdc-be13-13e4aa915fd0%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
