In filters we prefer using gt/gte/lt/lte because there you can be specific about including or excluding, but for aggregations you want "to" to exclude otherwise you end up with overlapping ranges.
What use case do you have where you want to change that? clint On 5 March 2014 14:26, mooky <nick.minute...@gmail.com> wrote: > Does anyone think this is a worthwhile change? > > > On Wednesday, 26 February 2014 12:41:53 UTC, mooky wrote: >> >> I think its necessary to be able to specify an *include_lower*/ >> *include_upper* option like with filters. >> >> >> On Tuesday, 25 February 2014 14:54:24 UTC, Binh Ly wrote: >>> >>> Yes, you are correct. The "from" is inclusive, and the "to" is exclusive. >>> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "elasticsearch" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to elasticsearch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/2160569c-643c-4ee1-9845-22339b78943f%40googlegroups.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/2160569c-643c-4ee1-9845-22339b78943f%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elasticsearch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAPt3XKT4k8Oett%3DzjHwzco0KKsoNMrUzgXzR0WSSnkpuK%2BxVQA%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
