I'm trying to filter on a calculated script field as well. Have you figured this out Kajal?
On Tuesday, May 27, 2014 10:49:35 AM UTC-6, Kajal Patel wrote: > > Hey, > > Can you actually post your solution If you figured out. > I am having similar issue, I need to filter search result based on > script_field. I don't want to use filter_script though because I am using > facets and I want my records to filter out for facets too. > > Do you know if can extends any class or any any plugin or anything to > filter my records based on the script field. > > > On Sunday, July 7, 2013 1:21:38 PM UTC-4, Oreno wrote: >> >> Hi Alex, >> 1.I checked the cash solution but its taking 15 times more then my >> starting time (10s against 150s), so that will be a problem since my filter >> has dynamic params. >> It does go fast once it's stored though. Do you know if it's possible to >> do some kind of cashing for all source documents for future queries? >> >> 2.From what I understand ,both the filter script and the script_field are >> suppose to go over each document that results from the prior query. >> The only thing I can think of that makes the difference is that the >> script_filter actually needs to filter the false documents (for the hit >> count) while the script_field only >> needs to add the field for the first 10 document returning by default. >> >> I'm trying to figure out how I can speed the response when using source() >> on native java script. >> I'm assuming the bottle neck is somewhere within creating the response. I >> read that using source has some overhead because elasticsearch has to >> parse the json source, >> but if that was the case here, then I should have received the same big >> overhead for both script_field and filter script runs. >> >> All I actually need is the hit count so if I'm correct about the response >> parsing and that can be excluded I'll be really glad. >> >> Any idea on the above? >> >> Appreciating your help. >> >> Oren >> >> >> On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Alexander Reelsen-2 [via ElasticSearch >> Users] <[hidden email] >> <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4037661&i=0>> wrote: >> >>> Hey, >>> >>> what kind of query are you executing? Using script fields results in the >>> scipt only being executed for each search hit, whereas executing it as a >>> script filter it might need to execute for each document in your index (you >>> can try to cache the script filter so it might be faster for subsequent >>> requests). >>> >>> Hope this helps as a start for optimization, if not, please provide some >>> more information. >>> >>> >>> --Alex >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 2:21 PM, oreno <[hidden email] >>> <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4037659&i=0>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, I notice that using a script_fields that returns true or false >>>> values is >>>> going much faster then >>>> using the same script but with filter script declaration (so it will >>>> filter >>>> the docs returning false). >>>> >>>> I was sure that the filter script is taking so long because I'm using >>>> the >>>> source().get(...) method, but turns out that when using the same script, >>>> only with script_fields instead, I'm receiving the performance I need. >>>> the >>>> only problem here is that I want to filter the docs that now have >>>> "MessageReverted" = false. >>>> >>>> 1.Any way I can filter the docs containing "MessageReverted" = false >>>> ?(some >>>> wrapper query?) >>>> 2. Any idea way the filter script is taking much longer then the script >>>> field(8000 mill against 250 mill)? >>>> >>>> both ways are retrieving the source() for the script logic so it can't >>>> be a >>>> matter of source fetching as far as I understand. >>>> >>>> fast: >>>> ..., >>>> "script_fields": { >>>> "MessageReverted": { >>>> "script": "revert", >>>> "lang": "native", >>>> "params": { >>>> "startDate": "2013-05-1", >>>> "endDate": "2013-05-1", >>>> "attributeId": "2365443", >>>> "segmentId": "2365443" >>>> } >>>> } >>>> } >>>> >>>> >>>> slow: >>>> ..., >>>> "filter": { >>>> "script": { >>>> "script": "revert", >>>> "lang": "native", >>>> "params": { >>>> "startDate": "2013-05-1", >>>> "endDate": "2013-05-1", >>>> "attributeId": "2365443", >>>> "segmentId": "2365443" >>>> } >>>> } >>>> } >>>> >>>> >>>> Any idea? >>>> >>>> Thanks in advanced, >>>> >>>> Oren >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> View this message in context: >>>> http://elasticsearch-users.115913.n3.nabble.com/script-fields-vs-filter-script-tp4037658.html >>>> Sent from the ElasticSearch Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "elasticsearch" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to [hidden email] >>>> <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4037659&i=1>. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "elasticsearch" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [hidden email] >>> <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4037659&i=2>. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the >>> discussion below: >>> >>> http://elasticsearch-users.115913.n3.nabble.com/script-fields-vs-filter-script-tp4037658p4037659.html >>> >>> To unsubscribe from script_fields vs filter script, click here. >>> NAML >>> <http://elasticsearch-users.115913.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> [image: Inline image 1] >> >> *Oren Orgad* | Software Engineer | *eXelate <http://www.exelate.com/>* >> >> *p:* +972- 72-2221329 | *e:* [hidden email] >> <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4037661&i=1> >> >> ------------------------------ >> View this message in context: Re: script_fields vs filter script >> <http://elasticsearch-users.115913.n3.nabble.com/script-fields-vs-filter-script-tp4037658p4037661.html> >> Sent from the ElasticSearch Users mailing list archive >> <http://elasticsearch-users.115913.n3.nabble.com/> at Nabble.com. >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elasticsearch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/1f75923c-6e22-4400-bee2-c4ad11eaeb6d%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
