For my test case it's the same every time. In the "real" query it will
change every time, but I planned to not cache this filter and have a less
granular date filter in the bool filter that would be cached. However while
debugging I noticed slowness with the date range filters even while testing
with the same value repeatedly.
On Jul 29, 2014 10:49 PM, "David Pilato" <da...@pilato.fr> wrote:

> Any chance your filter value changes for every call?
> Or are you using exactly the same value each time?
>
> --
> David ;-)
> Twitter : @dadoonet / @elasticsearchfr / @scrutmydocs
>
>
> Le 30 juil. 2014 à 05:03, Kireet Reddy <kir...@feedly.com> a écrit :
>
> One of my queries has been consistently taking 500ms-1s and I can't figure
> out why. Here is the query
> <https://gist.github.com/anonymous/d98fb2c46d9a7755e882> (it looks a bit
> strange as I have removed things that didn't seem to affect execution
> time). When I remove the range filter, the query consistently takes < 10ms.
> The query itself only results 1 hit with or without the range filter, so I
> am not sure why simply including this filter adds so much time. My nodes
> are not experiencing any filter cache evictions. I also tried moving it to
> the bool section with no luck. Changing execution to "fielddata" does
> improve execution time to < 10ms though. Since I am sorting on the same
> field, I suppose this should be fine. But I would like to understand why
> the slowdown occurs. The published field is a date type and has eager field
> data loading enabled.
>
> Thanks
> Kireet
>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "elasticsearch" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to elasticsearch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/994f4700-7a52-4db4-a2a7-d252732517bd%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/994f4700-7a52-4db4-a2a7-d252732517bd%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
> Google Groups "elasticsearch" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/elasticsearch/N0z5eZRPO2A/unsubscribe.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
> elasticsearch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CE4B26B8-5837-46C5-9E89-2AFBADED9BB6%40pilato.fr
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CE4B26B8-5837-46C5-9E89-2AFBADED9BB6%40pilato.fr?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to elasticsearch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CACkKG4iMwtd-i_NE2mWM6Ce3WeEGM_cpsJXzFsdOUc5n_PTU-A%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to