Hmm. So how do I invoke a reindex via the java API?
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 3:40 AM, Tihomir Lichev <shot...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I also had timing problems in my automated tests, the solution was to
> invoke index refresh and wait for it, then execute any search requests.
> This way you can make sure that all test data is ready for searching.
>
> 03 август 2014, неделя, 18:22:50 UTC+3, John D. Ament написа:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> So after running a few rounds of local automated tests, I've noticed that
>> sometimes I get the wrong results in my index. This seems to only be an
>> issue with my automated tests and not when running the application manually
>> (at least I haven't seen the wrong results after several executions).
>>
>> My search looks like this:
>>
>> SearchResponse searchResponse = esClient.client().
>> prepareSearch(indexName).setTypes(RECORD_TYPE)
>> .setFetchSource(true)
>> .setPostFilter(FilterBuilders.andFilter(
>> FilterBuilders.inFilter("typeId",types.toArray(new
>> Integer[]{})).cache(false),
>> FilterBuilders.inFilter("stateId",states.toArray(new
>> Integer[]{})).cache(false)
>> ).cache(false))
>> .addSort("dateCreated.value", SortOrder.DESC)
>> .addSort("recordId",SortOrder.DESC)
>> .execute().actionGet();
>>
>> The issue appears both with and without the cache flag passed in.
>>
>> The way my tests work is that I execute a bunch of seeds, then run
>> queries against the seeds to verify I get the right results. I'll create 5
>> records in my test, where the typeId's are always 1,2,3,4 and the stateIds
>> are anything between 1 and 14, except for 6.
>>
>> 5 is a special state in my case. I only want to include that state
>> sometimes. So I'll run one query with all the states except 5 and 6. I
>> expect that this will give me 4 records back (the 5th record is in state
>> 5). Instead I'm getting back 5 results, as if ES is also including state 5
>> in the list even though I didn't want it.
>>
>> In my test I run this query twice. The test fails sometimes on the first
>> execution, never on the second execution (I have an arquillian deployment,
>> and start up the app once, then seed data, run the first query in one test
>> method, run the second query in a second test method). I'm assuming that
>> these filters are acting like a pure AND - the record must match both
>> fields to be returned. So, any idea why I might be getting the wrong
>> results?
>>
>> John
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
> Google Groups "elasticsearch" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/elasticsearch/uy0YrsXXw44/unsubscribe.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
> elasticsearch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/16211527-5442-4e0e-ae64-62a0f30253d0%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/16211527-5442-4e0e-ae64-62a0f30253d0%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to elasticsearch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAOqetn8Yg3--qYSCvy60B_iqro7abU_cAEG%2BC7-HuzmDpogOfQ%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
