The easiest for me is to install fresh binaries but I'm not shy about 
learning about Maven while I build it from source.  

Thanks
Tony

On Friday, August 29, 2014 11:21:34 AM UTC-4, Jörg Prante wrote:
>
> Do you want to build from source? Or do you want to install a fresh binary?
>
> At jenkins.elasticsearch.org I can not find any snapshot builds but it 
> may be just me.
>
> It would be a nice add-on to provide snapshot builds for users that 
> eagerly await bug fixes or take a ride on the bleeding edge before the next 
> release arrives, without release notes etc.
>
> Jörg
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 4:29 PM, <tony....@iqor.com <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> Thanks again and sorry to bother you guys but I'm new to Github and don't 
>> know what do do from here.  Can you point me to the right place where I can 
>> take the next step to put this patch on my server?  I only know how to 
>> untar the tarball I downloaded from the main ES page.
>>
>> Thanks.
>> Tony
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, August 27, 2014 1:35:06 PM UTC-4, tony....@iqor.com wrote:
>>>
>>> Kudos!
>>>
>>> Tony
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, August 27, 2014 1:16:11 PM UTC-4, Jörg Prante wrote:
>>>>
>>>> All praise should go to the fantastic Elasticsearch team who did not 
>>>> hesitate to test the fix immediately and replaced it with a better working 
>>>> solution, since the lzf-compress software is having weaknesses regarding 
>>>> threadsafety.
>>>>
>>>> Jörg
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Ivan Brusic <iv...@brusic.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Amazing job. Great work.
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Ivan
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 12:41 PM, joerg...@gmail.com <
>>>>> joerg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I fixed the issue by setting the safe LZF encoder in LZFCompressor 
>>>>>> and opened a pull request 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://github.com/elasticsearch/elasticsearch/pull/7466
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jörg
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 8:17 PM, joerg...@gmail.com <
>>>>>> joerg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Still broken with lzf-compress 1.0.3
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://gist.github.com/jprante/d2d829b497db4963aea5
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jörg
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 7:54 PM, joerg...@gmail.com <
>>>>>>> joerg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks for the logstash mapping command. I can reproduce it now.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's the LZF encoder that bails out at org.elasticsearch.common.
>>>>>>>> compress.lzf.impl.UnsafeChunkEncoderBE._getInt
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> which uses in turn sun.misc.Unsafe.getInt
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have created a gist of the JVM crash file at 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://gist.github.com/jprante/79f4b4c0b9fd83eb1c9b
>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>> There has been a fix in LZF lately https://github.com/
>>>>>>>> ning/compress/commit/db7f51bddc5b7beb47da77eeeab56882c650bff7
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> for version 1.0.3 which has been released recently.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I will build a snapshot ES version with LZF 1.0.3 and see if this 
>>>>>>>> works...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jörg
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 11:30 PM, <tony....@iqor.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I captured a WireShark trace of the interaction between ES and 
>>>>>>>>> Logstash 1.4.1.  The error occurs even before my data is sent.  Can 
>>>>>>>>> you try 
>>>>>>>>> to reproduce it on your testbed with this message I captured?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> curl -XPUT http://amssc103-mgmt-app2:9200/_template/logstash -d @y
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Contests of file 'y":
>>>>>>>>> {  "template" : "logstash-*",  "settings" : {   
>>>>>>>>>  "index.refresh_interval" : "5s"  },  "mappings" : {    "_default_" : 
>>>>>>>>> {     
>>>>>>>>>   "_all" : {"enabled" : true},       "dynamic_templates" : [ {        
>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>> "string_fields" : {           "match" : "*",           
>>>>>>>>> "match_mapping_type" 
>>>>>>>>> : "string",           "mapping" : {             "type" : "string", 
>>>>>>>>> "index" 
>>>>>>>>> : "analyzed", "omit_norms" : true,               "fields" : {         
>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>>   "raw" : {"type": "string", "index" : "not_analyzed", "ignore_above" 
>>>>>>>>> : 
>>>>>>>>> 256}               }           }         }       } ],       
>>>>>>>>> "properties" : 
>>>>>>>>> {         "@version": { "type": "string", "index": "not_analyzed" },  
>>>>>>>>>      
>>>>>>>>>   "geoip"  : {           "type" : "object",             "dynamic": 
>>>>>>>>> true,   
>>>>>>>>>           "path": "full",             "properties" : {               
>>>>>>>>> "location" : { "type" : "geo_point" }             }         }       } 
>>>>>>>>>    } 
>>>>>>>>>  }}
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Monday, August 25, 2014 3:53:18 PM UTC-4, tony....@iqor.com 
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I have no plugins installed (yet) and only changed 
>>>>>>>>>> "es.logger.level" to DEBUG in logging.yml. 
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> elasticsearch.yml:
>>>>>>>>>> cluster.name: es-AMS1Cluster
>>>>>>>>>> node.name: "KYLIE1"
>>>>>>>>>> node.rack: amssc2client02
>>>>>>>>>> path.data: /export/home/apontet/elasticsearch/data
>>>>>>>>>> path.work: /export/home/apontet/elasticsearch/work
>>>>>>>>>> path.logs: /export/home/apontet/elasticsearch/logs
>>>>>>>>>> network.host: ********       <===== sanitized line; file contains 
>>>>>>>>>> actual server IP 
>>>>>>>>>> discovery.zen.ping.multicast.enabled: false
>>>>>>>>>> discovery.zen.ping.unicast.hosts: ["s1", "s2", "s3", "s5" , 
>>>>>>>>>> "s6", "s7"]   <===== Also sanitized
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>  Tony
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, August 23, 2014 6:29:40 AM UTC-4, Jörg Prante wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I tested a simple "Hello World" document on Elasticsearch 1.3.2 
>>>>>>>>>>> with Oracle JDK 1.7.0_17 64-bit Server VM, Sparc Solaris 10, 
>>>>>>>>>>> default 
>>>>>>>>>>> settings.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> No issues.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> So I would like to know more about the settings in 
>>>>>>>>>>> elasticsearch.yml, the mappings, and the installed plugins.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Jörg
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 11:25 AM, joerg...@gmail.com <
>>>>>>>>>>> joerg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I have some Solaris 10 Sparc V440/V445 servers available and 
>>>>>>>>>>>> can try to reproduce over the weekend.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Jörg
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 4:37 AM, Robert Muir <
>>>>>>>>>>>> rober...@elasticsearch.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> How big is it? Maybe i can have it anyway? I pulled two 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ancient ultrasparcs out of my closet to try to debug your issue, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> but 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> unfortunately they are a pita to work with (dead nvram battery on 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> both, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> zeroed mac address, etc.) Id still love to get to the bottom of 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> this.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  On Aug 22, 2014 3:59 PM, <tony....@iqor.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Adrien,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's a bunch of garbled binary data, basically a dump of the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> process image.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tony
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, August 21, 2014 6:36:12 PM UTC-4, Adrien Grand 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Tony,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you have more information in the core dump file? (cf. the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Core dump written" line that you pasted)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 7:53 PM, <tony....@iqor.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I installed ES 1.3.2 on a spare Solaris 11/ T4-4 SPARC 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> server to scale out of small x86 machine.  I get a similar 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exception 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running ES with JAVA_OPTS=-d64.  When Logstash 1.4.1 sends the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> first 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message I get the error below on the ES process:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Environment:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #  SIGBUS (0xa) at pc=0xffffffff7a9a3d8c, pid=14473, tid=209
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # JRE version: 7.0_25-b15
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (23.25-b01 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mixed mode solaris-sparc compressed oops)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # Problematic frame:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # V  [libjvm.so+0xba3d8c]  Unsafe_GetInt+0x158
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # Core dump written. Default location: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /export/home/elasticsearch/elasticsearch-1.3.2/core or 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> core.14473
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # If you would like to submit a bug report, please visit:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #   http://bugreport.sun.com/bugreport/crash.jsp
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---------------  T H R E A D  ---------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Current thread (0x0000000107078000):  JavaThread 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "elasticsearch[KYLIE1][http_server_worker][T#17]{New I/O 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> worker #147}" daemon [_thread_in_vm, id=209, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stack(0xffffffff5b800000,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0xffffffff5b840000)]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> siginfo:si_signo=SIGBUS: si_errno=0, si_code=1 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (BUS_ADRALN), si_addr=0x0000000709cc09e7
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can run ES using 32bit java but have to shrink 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ES_HEAPS_SIZE more than I want to.  Any assistance would be 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appreciated.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tony
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, July 22, 2014 5:43:28 AM UTC-4, David Roberts 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After upgrading from Elasticsearch 1.0.1 to 1.2.2 I'm 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> getting JVM core dumps on Solaris 10 on SPARC.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Environment:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #  SIGBUS (0xa) at pc=0xffffffff7e452d78, pid=15483, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tid=263
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # JRE version: Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (7.0_55-b13) (build 1.7.0_55-b13)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (24.55-b03 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mixed mode solaris-sparc compressed oops)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # Problematic frame:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # V  [libjvm.so+0xc52d78]  Unsafe_GetLong+0x158
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm pretty sure the problem here is that Elasticsearch is 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> making increasing use of "unsafe" functions in Java, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> presumably to speed 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things up, and some CPUs are more picky than others about 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> memory 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alignment.  In particular, x86 will tolerate misaligned 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> memory access 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> whereas SPARC won't.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Somebody has tried to report this to Oracle in the past 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and (understandably) Oracle has said that if you're going to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use unsafe 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> functions you need to understand what you're doing: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://bugs.java.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> id=8021574
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A quick grep through the code of the two versions of 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Elasticsearch shows that the new use of "unsafe" memory 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> access functions is 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the BytesReference, MurmurHash3 and HyperLogLogPlusPlus 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> classes:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bash-3.2$ git checkout v1.0.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Checking out files: 100% (2904/2904), done.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bash-3.2$ find . -name '*.java' | xargs grep UnsafeUtils
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/common/util/UnsafeUtils.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> java:public enum UnsafeUtils {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/search/aggregations/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bucket/BytesRefHash.java:            if (id == -1L || 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UnsafeUtils.equals(key, get(id, spare))) {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/search/aggregations/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bucket/BytesRefHash.java:            } else if 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (UnsafeUtils.equals(key, get(curId, spare))) {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/benchmark/common/util/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BytesRefComparisonsBenchmark.java:import 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.elasticsearch.common.util.UnsafeUtils;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/benchmark/common/util/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BytesRefComparisonsBenchmark.java:                return 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UnsafeUtils.equals(b1, b2);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bash-3.2$ git checkout v1.2.2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Checking out files: 100% (2220/2220), done.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bash-3.2$ find . -name '*.java' | xargs grep UnsafeUtils
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/common/bytes/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BytesReference.java:import org.elasticsearch.common.util.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UnsafeUtils;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/common/bytes/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BytesReference.java:                return 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UnsafeUtils.equals(a.array(), a.arrayOffset(), b.array(), 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b.arrayOffset(), 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a.length());
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/common/hash/MurmurHash3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> java:import org.elasticsearch.common.util.UnsafeUtils;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/common/hash/MurmurHash3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> java:        return UnsafeUtils.readLongLE(key, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blockOffset);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/common/hash/MurmurHash3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> java:                long k1 = 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UnsafeUtils.readLongLE(key, i);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/common/hash/MurmurHash3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> java:                long k2 = 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UnsafeUtils.readLongLE(key, i + 8);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/common/util/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BytesRefHash.java:            if (id == -1L || 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UnsafeUtils.equals(key, get(id, spare))) {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/common/util/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BytesRefHash.java:            } else if 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (UnsafeUtils.equals(key, get(curId, spare))) {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/common/util/UnsafeUtils.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> java:public enum UnsafeUtils {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/search/aggregations/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> metrics/cardinality/HyperLogLogPlusPlus.java:import 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.elasticsearch.common.util.UnsafeUtils;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/search/aggregations/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> metrics/cardinality/HyperLogLogPlusPlus.java:            
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> return UnsafeUtils.readIntLE(readSpare.bytes, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> readSpare.offset);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/benchmark/common/util/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BytesRefComparisonsBenchmark.java:import 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.elasticsearch.common.util.UnsafeUtils;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/benchmark/common/util/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BytesRefComparisonsBenchmark.java:                return 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UnsafeUtils.equals(b1, b2);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Presumably one of these three new uses is what is causing 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the JVM SIGBUS error I'm seeing.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A quick look at the MurmurHash3 class shows that the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hash128 method accepts an arbitrary offset and passes it to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an unsafe 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> function with no check that it's a multiple of 8:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     public static Hash128 hash128(byte[] key, int offset, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> int length, long seed, Hash128 hash) {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         long h1 = seed;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         long h2 = seed;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         if (length >= 16) {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>             final int len16 = length & 0xFFFFFFF0; // 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> higher multiple of 16 that is lower than or equal to length
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>             final int end = offset + len16;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>             for (int i = offset; i < end; i += 16) {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                 long k1 = UnsafeUtils.readLongLE(key, i);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                 long k2 = UnsafeUtils.readLongLE(key, i + 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is a recipe for generating JVM core dumps on 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> architectures such as SPARC, Itanium and PowerPC that don't 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> support 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unaligned 64 bit memory access.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does Elasticsearch have any policy for support of hardware 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other than x86?  If not, I don't think many people would care 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but you 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> really ought to clearly say so on your platform support page. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  If you do 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> intend to support non-x86 architectures then you need to be 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much more 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> careful about the use of unsafe memory accesses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> David
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  -- 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "elasticsearch" group.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from it, send an email to elasticsearc...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/eb7f4c23-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b63e-4c2e-87c3-029fc58449fc%40googlegroups.com 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/eb7f4c23-b63e-4c2e-87c3-029fc58449fc%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Adrien Grand
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  -- 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "elasticsearch" group.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it, send an email to elasticsearc...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/12aa33de-ccc
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7-485a-8c52-562f3e91a535%40googlegroups.com 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/12aa33de-ccc7-485a-8c52-562f3e91a535%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  -- 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "elasticsearch" group.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it, send an email to elasticsearc...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAMUKNZXOKeJ
>>>>>>>>>>>>> q8Datx2KY7cSfJXDH1YGDNmQjNWDQ2jci%3DfN31Q%40mail.gmail.com 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAMUKNZXOKeJq8Datx2KY7cSfJXDH1YGDNmQjNWDQ2jci%3DfN31Q%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>  -- 
>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>>>> Groups "elasticsearch" group.
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>>>>> send an email to elasticsearc...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/c62191ea-
>>>>>>>>> 543b-462d-95e9-aff125c0a6f0%40googlegroups.com 
>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/c62191ea-543b-462d-95e9-aff125c0a6f0%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>  -- 
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>> Groups "elasticsearch" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>> send an email to elasticsearc...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>  To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/
>>>>>> CAKdsXoHrOOqhgOSiRhmweSR5wLs%2BJiO70_CSRO%2BFS2zOU9VKzg%
>>>>>> 40mail.gmail.com 
>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAKdsXoHrOOqhgOSiRhmweSR5wLs%2BJiO70_CSRO%2BFS2zOU9VKzg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>> .
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  -- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>> Groups "elasticsearch" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>>> an email to elasticsearc...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/
>>>>> msgid/elasticsearch/CALY%3DcQAvCoJwN8tSJXa8%3DZHMDYw_
>>>>> mpHc0Q866fcso_1LZCFiyw%40mail.gmail.com 
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CALY%3DcQAvCoJwN8tSJXa8%3DZHMDYw_mpHc0Q866fcso_1LZCFiyw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "elasticsearch" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to elasticsearc...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/205b2250-f6ee-4141-a49a-ff22aade0fe9%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/205b2250-f6ee-4141-a49a-ff22aade0fe9%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to elasticsearch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/45c53e81-2c8a-40cd-aadd-15891a09e30d%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to