On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Robert Muir <robert.m...@elasticsearch.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Nikolas Everett <nik9...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > One thing on my side is that I don't really _need_ phrase queries. I can > > play around with the specification a bit so long as I stay sane. I just > > need to make documents that contain the terms near each other float to > the > > top. It'd be better if it was the exact phrases but some false > positives is > > probably ok. The phrase query got the job done but if there is a way to > > cheat it I'm happy to try. > > For this purpose, why not stay with small window sizes (e.g. your 64, > or maybe even much smaller). IMO terms being present within massively > large windows means nothing. Personally i would consider one much > smaller, like 5. I know there have been experiments/papers around > this, i can dig up if you need, but I think its also kind of > intuitive. > > This is probably a lot easier than doing anything around speeding up > sloppy phrase scoring. > Sorry, I mean the rescore window. I just set the phrase slop window to 1. 0 ignores some good matches - 2 brings up too much. Thats really me more tuning it to my tastes than anything but yeah. I could try setting a higher slop and see if that improves precision and what that costs for performance though. Nik -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elasticsearch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAPmjWd36TJhnM8fh8xwVrB7mgr6cN%2BQfFeo6XMn7vYDaqtdKzw%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
