Unfortunately, it depends on many factors, but basically elasticsearch 1.x is going to have faster bool filter if your sub filters are dense and can be efficiently loaded into bitsets (eg. range, term, terms filters), and the `and` filter is going to be faster if your sub filters are sparse, or if they need to be evaluated one-doc at a time (eg. geo or script filters).
We are not too happy with the fact that we can't make the right decisions in elasticsearch itself, but this is hopefully something that will be addressed in the next major version (there is already some progress towards that direction in the master branch). On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 1:46 AM, Fei Xie <virgil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > In this article > http://www.elasticsearch.org/blog/all-about-elasticsearch-filter-bitsets/, > it's saying bool is faster than add/or filters. But at that time it's > elasticsearch 0.9. > Is this still the truth? > > Thanks! > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "elasticsearch" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to elasticsearch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/69acf937-ea05-4bf0-b3a6-f469644f842d%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/69acf937-ea05-4bf0-b3a6-f469644f842d%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Adrien Grand -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elasticsearch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAL6Z4j4bnRfNEAZGoqdzbO9powfyYV6UmzDJthiG3spEVBpWMA%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
