Can you elaborate what you mean by becoming an issue?

When you add a node into the cluster it will automatically start to
reallocate shards to the new node, you can't have a node sitting there idle
and with lots of disk space free waiting for the other nodes to fill up
before being called upon.

As for nginx, it depends what you do with it. ES will spread the load
amongst the cluster automatically, but if you're using nginx as a front end
then it's up to you to factor the other nodes in.

On 6 January 2015 at 01:51, Simon Thorley <si...@thenom.co.uk> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I have designed and setup an ELK stack that can be expanded horizontally
> (i hope) using the following technologies:
>
> haproxy x2 (failover) => Logstash x2 => nginx x2 (failover) =>
> elasticsearch x2
>
> The capacity of the elasticsearch nodes have come into question and this
> has raised a few questions regards spec of a new node.
>
> Here is the current specs of the elasticsearch nodes ( i have 2 of these):
>
> ·         HP DL360p Gen8 10-SFF CTO Server
>
> ·         64G PC3L-12800R-11
>
> ·         8x 900G 10K SAS
>
> ·         2x 300G 10K SAS
>
> ·         2G FBWC
>
> ·         Dual 750W PSU
>
> ·         4P 1GBE 331FLR
>
>
> So i am currently running the OS from the 2x 300Gb in a mirror raid, and 2
> data logical data drives using 4 of the 8 900GB drives (so 2 striped raids
> containing 4x900GB drives).
>
>
> This is all working fine but the data capacity has become an issue (14TB
> total available) .  I think for the moment i have enough compute power but
> what would happen if i added a lower spec node (or multiple), marked them
> as a data node (non-master) but with different storage capacity available.
> Say for example 20TB in each.
>
>
> If the original 2 nodes filed there data stores and the only store
> available was the new node(s) then they would be processing the shards
> alone and there would be no protection from replica's if this node went
> down, no?
>
>
> As an additional but not as critical at the moment:
>
> If i eventually have the same issue with compute power, if these 2 someday
> become saturated and i make another node a master node but it was half the
> spec, would elasticsearch realize this and distribute the load or is this
> purely down to nginx load distribution?
>
>
> Thanks for any help\advice in advance.
>
> Simon
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "elasticsearch" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to elasticsearch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/8450d29f-9a1b-40c0-87e5-9fa2b18f364d%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/8450d29f-9a1b-40c0-87e5-9fa2b18f364d%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to elasticsearch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAEYi1X8QvYr9hCBgYPC4LoPOv-eTqRLh-zFMxh1%3D95H4qYu4RQ%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to