Hi, Could somebody answer, please?
On Tuesday, 17 March 2015 19:05:38 UTC+2, Dmitry Kan wrote: > > Hello! > > I'm a newbie in elasticsearch, so forgive if the question is lame. > > I have implemented a custom plugin using a custom lemmatizer and a > tokenizer. The simplified class sequence: > > > AnalysisMorphologyPlugin->MorphologyAnalysisBinderProcessor->SemanticAnalyzerTwitterLemmatizerProvider->RussianLemmatizingTwitterAnalyzer > > In the RussianLemmatizingTwitterAnalyzer's ctor I load the custom object for > lemmatization (object unrelated to lucene/es) in a singleton fashion (in a > syncrhonized code block). > Then, when creating 14 indices in the same JVM I see > 14 instances of RussianLemmatizingTwitterAnalyzer, > 4 instances of SemanticAnalyzerTwitterLemmatizerProvider, > 4 instances of MorphologyAnalysisBinderProcessor, > 30 instances of the custom lemmatizer (in each > RussianLemmatizingTwitterAnalyzer only one instance is expected, so should be > 14), > 1 instance of AnalysisMorphologyPlugin. > > The question is, can RussianLemmatizingTwitterAnalyzer object be made shared > between indices? Or is it by design, that they must load separately per index? > What could be wrong in the code that makes 30 instances of the custom > singleton lemmatizer instead of 14? > > The current standing is that *with* the plugin 100M of RAM is reserved by the > JVM with no data. *Without* the plugin the JVM reserves 2M with no data. > Elasticsearch 1.3.2, Lucene 4.9.0. > > Regards, > > Dmitry Kan > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elasticsearch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/c2c57184-ee3b-4600-9091-a515b496b867%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
