What about data volumes, index and search rates?

On 11 May 2015 at 11:40, haries fajar nugroho <harie...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Mark,
>
> Thanks, really appreciate your response. Previously i thought that it is
> better kibana to communicate with master rather than data node, but i was
> wrong.
>
> So this is my setup, hope it answers your question:
>
> Currently, my cluster contain 2 nodes (node a and node b). Node a as
> master node, data note, and also logstash server and node b as data node
> only. Each node has the same disk space, same ram amount, same network
> interface on the same subnet, allocated 2gb as heap size for each nodes,
> using unicast to talk between node, 5 shard and 1 replica,  65536 of
> max_file_descriptors, enable mlockall, and 1.5-3GB of logs/hour that needs
> to be processed, both nodes using elasticsearch version 1.5.2, the logs
> sent by logstash forwarder from 2 servers.
>
> Regards,
>
> On Monday, May 11, 2015 at 4:43:17 AM UTC+7, Mark Walkom wrote:
>>
>> As I said, we don't recommend sending queries, which includes those
>> generated by Kibana, to master only nodes. You would be better off sending
>> them to data nodes.
>>
>> As for your performance problems, that's a multi-layered problem that may
>> not be solved just by adding more nodes. You need to provide more
>> information around your cluster setup.
>>
>> On 10 May 2015 at 22:16, haries fajar nugroho <hari...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Mark,
>>>
>>> Thanks for your sharing. It's best if kibana talks to client node. But
>>> which is better, kibana talks to master mode or kibana talks directly to
>>> data nodes. And currently, my query needs 5-6 secs and i want to improve it
>>> to 1-2 secs. Which is better adding more nodes or adding more ram to
>>> existing node ?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> --
>>> Please update your bookmarks! We moved to https://discuss.elastic.co/
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "elasticsearch" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to elasticsearc...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/033706f5-4291-43a9-b6f9-e9f523faedf9%40googlegroups.com
>>> .
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>  --
> Please update your bookmarks! We have moved to https://discuss.elastic.co/
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "elasticsearch" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to elasticsearch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/9d85dfa7-4e97-4788-bc5a-ff3bd65c814e%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/9d85dfa7-4e97-4788-bc5a-ff3bd65c814e%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
Please update your bookmarks! We have moved to https://discuss.elastic.co/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to elasticsearch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAEYi1X_QC2GTfXenJeRCg8Ey4VyjpRH0%2BOPj%2BCLWAC98fU_5AQ%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to