Vic:

Because there is so much going on in EMI, and so much of that, being extremely sensitive to boundary conditions, is unique to a specific situation, there will always be room for respectful disagreement as to how to solve or prevent problems.

If radiation from the exterior surface of the antenna feedline were the only mechanism that causes emi, then you would be right, choking it off would solve the emi problem. The energy in the transmission line would be radiated by the antenna or turned into heat by either the line losses or by the losses in the materials used to make up the choke. However, emi can be caused by many other mechanisms, and as one other poster to the reflector has reported, improving his RF ground substantially mitigated his problem.

I do agree that an effective RF ground is hideously difficult to achieve at HF. I did not recommend using an 8 foot rod as an RF ground. I merely observed that it is better than nothing. I admit that an 8 foot ground rod with a short lead would be a quarter-wavelength, and thus would look like a perfect open circuit at 10 meters. On the other hand, for typical soil, at 80 meters it would present a complex impedance on the order of 15 + J 25 Ohms. That is uncomfortably high, but far better than nothing.

The "least bad" HF electrode that I reported in my previous post was based on an Army/Air Force study about 20 years ago. Whether or not it is worth the considerable trouble needed to install it is a judgment call. I did install such a system, and if I had it to do again, I definitely would. I have had no emi problems at my station, despite the fact that my QTH is bristling with all sorts of new-fangled "smart house" electronics.

73,

Steve
AA4AK
Brunswick ME



At 08:33 AM 1/29/2005 -0800, you wrote:
Stephen W. Kercel wrote:

Third, having no RF ground is a big nono. The problem is that the RF that is on the chassis of your rig has to go somewhere.

I'm sorry, I have to respectfully disagree. If you have a balanced antenna system, or even an unbalanced system with RF properly choked off from the outside of your coax, there will be no RF on the chassis that 'as to go somewhere'.

In addition, it is very difficult to provide an RF ground at HF. Even the 8-foot wire you mention will have significant impedance. And a ground rod is of absolutely NO use for RF grounding, although correctly applied ground rods may be useful for lightning protection.

--
73,
Vic, K2VCO
Fresno CA
http://www.qsl.net/k2vco


_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply via email to