In answer to your last two comments, yes and yes. Although I passed a 20 wpm test in front of an FCC examiner, I'll confess to not being much of a CW op. Nevertheless, with my TS-870 and its built-in Accukeyer I send nearly flawless CW. With the K3---well if I haven't programmed the message with the utility, I don't send it.
I suppose it's me, but I thought the object of electronic keyers was to improve sending, not make it worse. So I have what is arguably the finest CW rig around and what do I do with it? I took up RTTY. Overly harsh? Perhaps, but it seems like this is something that could be fixed in software. That's the point of SDR, right? Wes N M S W S.....N 7 W S --- On Mon, 9/20/10, Barry <w...@comcast.net> wrote: > For many years, I've used the > Island keyer II (in CMOS Superkeyer III > emulation mode), the CMOS Superkeyer III, and prior to that > the VVF > Accu-keyer. > > I find with the K3 keyer, I tend to miss trailing dits, > particularly > with iambic character like C, presumably due to differences > in timing, > such as the dot memory. I guess the solution is going > back to my > external keyer. Wonder if many others have had this > experience? > > Barry W2UP > > -- ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html