Right, some are going to prefer the treble biased K3 rx audio featured in this video and some are going to prefer the more bassy FT5K. My point is that either rig can easily be made to sound treble, bassy, neutral, etc. Given both radios and 10 minutes, I could make the K3 sound just like the FT5K in that video and could make the FT5K sound just like the K3 sounded. That video proved nothing.
Barry N1EU On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 1:27 AM, Don Wilhelm <w3...@embarqmail.com> wrote: > As I said, the K3 sounded more intelligible to my ears, while the FT had > more bass content - others are allowed to differ. You have heard the advice > from Jim Brown and Joe Subich many times on this reflector to reduce the TX > EQ bass response for better intelligibility and more effective SSB power - > receive is not much different unless one is striving for "broadcast quality" > instead of intelligibility. > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
