It would remove the interference possibly conduited on the USB RS232 cable. It would remove the interference sometimes originating from the USB RS232 cable itself. It would remove the constantly meandering drivers being changed to accommodate yet another marginal application to the "universal" soup.
Blue tooth MIGHT have the serious advantage of the crowd passing it by, leaving it alone to be STABLE, after the fashion of RS232, whose drivers are stable because nobody is developing to them any more, hence no need for change. Beyond that? Probably not much. Then there is the downside of possible issues with a given Bluetooth device, the undiscovered country, so to speak. An unknown enemy always seems more friendly than the known one you love to hate. 73, Guy. On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 9:41 AM, John Ragle <tpcj1...@crocker.com> wrote: > My education needed: why would (in principle) using a Bluetooth > connection to a K3 remove "PC interference?" All the clocks and > clock-generated sharp-edged waveforms will still be present... > > I don't want to re-start the manifold discussions of PC interference, > just to have this one item clarified... > > Thanks to the list... > > John Ragle -- W1ZI > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
