While that is another option, I have used LP PAN in the past. For me the P3 is much more flexible. My computer screens are already clogged up with logging programs etc. It is nice to look over at the P3 and do what I need to do on the P3 without losing window focus on other apps etc.
The P3-small was just an interesting idea. Is there a big enough market? Probably not. As Elecraft has not commented on it I doubt it has made their radar. It is interesting to read about how others use their radios and peripherals in ways that I had not thought about. Mike On 4/28/2011 9:10 AM, Edward R. Cole wrote: > It seems to me this supports the argument for using a laptop for > display. The LP-Pan would be ideal due to its small size. A > screenless compact version of the P3 would be as convenient. I > assume that laptops are taken on dx-peditions for logging. > > > 73, Ed - KL7UW, WD2XSH/45 > ====================================== > BP40IQ 500 KHz - 10-GHz www.kl7uw.com > EME: 50-1.1kW?, 144-1.4kw, 432-100w, 1296-testing*, 3400-? > DUBUS Magazine USA Rep dubus...@hotmail.com > ====================================== > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
