My 20MHz dual-trace oscilloscope and DMM still work - and I still use them.
 I hope they will make test equipment kits again.
Some folks are still running their Heathkit radios too.

73's,
John
AJ6BC

On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 3:46 PM, <k...@baymoon.com> wrote:

> In the 1950s, the Heathkit AT-1 and AR-3 were pure junk. Yes, the prices
> were low, but the design quality was awful. The DX-20, DX-35 and DX-40
> were just okay but the VF-1 was trash. The DX-100 and DX-100B were okay if
> you were "rock bound," but if you used the VFO - it was a VF-1 - and it
> was terrible on CW and drifty on AM.
>
> By the 1960s, Heathkit had decided to be the poor man's alternative to
> Collins KWM-2. And, to their credit, the SB- and HW- series transceivers
> were a good value for the money.
>
> But, once the Japanese came in with FT-101B and TS-520, Heathkit's
> response was inferior and could not compete on price. That was the
> beginning of the end of its ham-radio kit line.
>
> In terms of design quality and value, Elecraft blows Heathkit, Collins,
> and Drake away and is certainly giving Yaesu and ICOM a run for their
> money.
>
> So, who cares if Heathkit may make ham-radio kits, again? They've lost
> several decades of experience which they'll never regain.
>
> Rob K6RB
>
>
>
>
> > Elecraft List,
> >
> > FYI:
> >
> >
> http://www.eetimes.com/discussion/break-points/4219631/Heathkit-returns-?cid=NL_Embedded&Ecosystem=embedded
> >
> > 73's,
> > John C. Westmoreland, P.E.
> > AJ6BC
> > ______________________________________________________________
> > Elecraft mailing list
> > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailน
>
>
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Reply via email to