Some good thoughts.  Morse Code is MORE than just sequences of 'dots' and 
'dashes'
(dits and dahs if you will!)
What is also VERY important is 'timing'.  if I send  'as'  'kin'  'g' instead 
of 'asking'
 or a word like 'yes'  'terd'  'ay' instead of 'yesterday' it has a great 
chance to
become misunderstood or garbled.
Morse has a definite "beat" like music, or you could say a cadence that must be
kept up with if it is to be easily understood.  I observe a lot of very 
disconnected
words being sent nowadays that makes the code much more difficult to "decode"
in the head.  ESPECIALLY when one begins to copy whole syllables and/or words.
The whole concept sounds very practical.  Something you can do without l
ooking at a keyboard too!
73,
Sandy W5TVW
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Margaret Leber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Elecraft" <Elecraft@mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 10:50 AM
Subject: [Elecraft] " Back to the Future - Morse Code and Cellular Phones"


|   Published on The O'Reilly Network (http://www.oreillynet.com/)
|   http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/wlg/7016
|
| Back to the Future - Morse Code and Cellular Phones
| by Brian McConnell
| Jun. 28, 2005
|
| I've spent most of the past five or so years thinking about handheld
| devices, their limitations and how to work around them. Having worked
| with telephones since I was in high school, this has been something of
| an obsession.
|
|
| The hot trend today is to cram every feature imaginable into mobile
| telephone handsets. This has led to some cool things like camera phones,
| mobile gaming, and such. The problem is that a lot of designers overlook
| some basic limitations in these devices, and more importantly, the
| situations in which people use them.
|
|
| Cellular phones are all about mobility. Good mobility applications
| recognize that the user is often in motion (walking, driving, etc).
| Safety and convenience require that the application should demand as
| little visual attention as possible. Badly designed applications force
| the user to stare at the telephone's display instead of paying attention
| to surrounding environs. This is why speech user interfaces work so well
| for mobile users. They allow the user to interact with a service in a
| "heads up" stance, without looking at the phone. Unfortunately, most
| mobile applications are of the badly designed "let's take a PC interface
| and shrink it down" category.
|
|
| Text messaging is an enormously popular service, but it too suffers from
| this basic user interface conflict. Sending and receiving text messages
| requires the user to look at the display. Receiving messages can be done
| at a glance, so this is not such a burden. Sending them is another
| story. Some people are adept at tapping messages on numeric keypads, but
| doing so requires the user to pay attention to the display. Try writing
| a text message without looking at the phone. Not easy.
|
|
| "Tapping"
|
|
| Morse Code, or a derivative of it, could be one way to solve this
| problem. With Morse Code, one could tap text messages out without
| looking at the telephone, and without having to fumble with ever smaller
| keypads. I'll admit that the idea of resurrecting Morse Code seems
| improbable, but then it's worth remembering that only a few years ago,
| the idea of people typing with their thumbs also seemed absurd.
|
|
| How might Morse be incorporated into a telephone handset. I sketched out
| a fairly simple interface. Here's what I came up with.
|
|
| The telephone would have a fairly large pressure sensitive panel on its
| back side, big enough that you would not have to look at the phone to
| locate it. It might also be possible to use the telephone's existing
| microphone to sense taps (although discriminating between short and long
| pulses could be a problem).
|
|
| You'd send messages in a couple of different ways depending on how you
| were carrying the phone at the time. I devised a couple of tweaks to
| make the process of sending messages faster.
|
|
| When carrying the phone at your side, you could send messages with one
| hand by tapping on the back of the phone in the convention dot (short)
| and dash (notation). The panel would interpret a brief pulse as a dot, a
| longer pulse as a dash. Timing is important, so this method of sending
| messages takes more practice.
|
|
| With both hands free or with the phone resting on a surface, you could
| use a slightly different method to tap messages. Holding the phone in
| one hand and tapping with the other, you'd tap the panel with your
| fingernail to send a dot, and with your whole fingertip to send a dash.
| Timing is much less important here, so this method will be easier for
| people to learn.
|
|
| Receiving messages is less of an issue, since they'll arrive as text
| messages. The sending telephone will convert the tapped dots and dashes
| into alphanumeric messages to be sent via SMS or IP. The receiving
| telephone will display these in the usual way (an option to play
| messages via text to speech synthesis would be a nice add-on, and as
| mobile phones become more powerful, should be easy enough to do).
|
|
| Hands-Free Mobile Phone Features
|
|
| Incorporating a Morse Code key into the back of a telephone handset has
| other uses besides tapping text messages. One of the things this enables
| you to do is to make it easier to control a telephone in hands-free mode.
|
|
| For example, you could design the phone so that it recognizes certain
| codes as keypad commands, primarily for deciding how to deal with
| incoming calls.
|
|
| .. = answer call
| ... = send call to voice mail
| .... = forward call to preprogrammed number
|
|
| So while you're driving along, you could dispatch incoming calls as
| desired by tapping on the back of the handset, something you could do
| heads up, without taking your eyes off the road.
|
|
| While this isn't Morse Code per se, it's the same idea, and it should be
| easy to train users to learn a handful of short two or three digit codes
| as in the example above. This is probably more realistic than training
| users to compose SMS messages in Morse, as anybody can memorize a
| handful of tap sequences.
|
|
| Back to the Future
|
|
| I'll admit this may seem like a bit dated, but even with a Treo 600, I
| find it difficult to type text messages. It seems to me that something
| like this is worth a try. The cost of embedding this in a handset should
| be pretty minimal compared to that of other features like digital
| cameras. You're basically talking about a small plate attached to a
| piezo-electric sensor, which is about as simple as it gets. Even better
| if you can make this work using a phone's existing microphone to sense taps.
|
|
| Would people actually use this? I don't know. It's hard to tell what
| will catch on. I thought ringtones and camera phones were improbable at
| best, and now those are both billion dollar industries. If something
| like this makes it easier to use SMS, then my guess is that it will
| catch on, at least with a subset of users.
|
|
| While the Morse Code application may not catch on outside a small group
| of power users, the idea of using Morse-like code to control a telephone
| in hands-free mode makes a lot of sense. Tap twice to answer a call
| while driving, three times to send it to voice mail, four times to
| forward the call to your secretary. That'll be easier that opening the
| phone and pushing a key while driving, and a heck of a lot safer.
|
| Brian McConnell is the founder of Trekmail, a mixed-media messaging
| service provider. An inventor, serial entrepreneur, and author, he also
| wrote Beyond Contact: A Guide to SETI and Communicating with Alien
| Civilizations.
|
| oreillynet.com Copyright © 2004 O'Reilly Media, Inc.
|
| -- 
| -----/___.   _)Margaret Stephanie Leber CCP, SCJP/"The art of progress /
| ----/(, /|  /| http://voicenet.com/~maggie SCWCD/ is to preserve order/
| ---/   / | / |  _   _   _    `  _  AOPA 925383/ amid change and to  /
| --/ ) /  |/  |_(_(_(_/_(_/__(__(/_      K3XS / preserve change amid/
| -/ (_/   '        .-/ .-/        ARRL 39280 /order."-A.N.Whitehead/
| /________________(_/_(_/_______AMSAT 32844_/<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>/
|
|
| _______________________________________________
| Elecraft mailing list
| Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
| You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
| Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
|  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
|
| Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
| Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
|
|
|
| -- 
| No virus found in this incoming message.
| Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
| Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.6/33 - Release Date: 6/28/2005
|
|

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft    

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply via email to