Don, 

You might also consider making it a three sided loop with the apex away from 
the house to a friendly tree.  Several hams are doing it that way and the 
patterns are not the same as a square loop, but the match and multiband 
operation is equal,  a thought.

Mel, K6KBE



________________________________
From: Mike Rodgers <mikerodgerske5...@yahoo.com>
To: "Elecraft@mailman.qth.net" <Elecraft@mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2011 12:28 PM
Subject: [Elecraft] Re (Elecraft ) 160 m loop a big failure

Don, I'm certainly sad to hear your having problems. Do you have any excess 
ladder line in the shack? That's about the only thing I can think of. 

My only rfi has been in amplified speakers on 17m. The feedpoint of my 
80 m delta loop is 25' from the shack over the house. The house is not inside 
the loop but under one corner. 
300 ohm line come inside to a manual tuner. The old mfj had a 1:1 balun and the 
palstar I now use is 4:1 but the 1:1 worked. Their is a gap vertical inside the 
loop. I used to run 500 w but now run qrp most of the time. 
Did you have the issue at 100w and is shack on ground or basement level. 

Also some commented on loops being 
Nvis antennas and they are on the cut frequency but the elevation take off 
angle comes down at multiple wavelengths. Their pattern is best compromise at 3 
or 4 wavelengths. 

73
Mike R

Sent from my spy ring
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Reply via email to