This is just my opinion, I could be wrong... We will have to be very careful that we don't end up with a channelized mess like the U.S. CB channels. I for one probably won't use it for amateur communications, due to the congestion that will be on those channels.
Me thinks the ARRL AND the FCC made a mistake when it originally allocated the channelized 60m Amateure band. It would have been smarter to allocate a continuous band as Mike suggests. It didn't have to be 60m. It could have been a continuous segment of the old 11m band. 73, Tom Amateur Radio Operator N5GE ARRL Lifetime Member QCWA Lifetime Member On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 02:12:48 -0600 (GMT-06:00), Mike Morrow <k...@earthlink.net> wrote: [snip] >Without the events of 11 September 2001, it is likely that a small >*continuous* segment would have been made available in the 5 MHz range. > >73, >Mike / KK5F ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
