Did I read right that the forthcoming KAT500 would be able to match up to a 
10:1 SWR?

So, this should mean that the impedance range of the tuner is anywhere from 5 
to 500 ohms (absolute value of Z).

I currently use an AT1KM tuner with impedance range of 20 to 1500 ohms.  I use 
this with a horizontal delta loop and I am able to match all of my important 
bands that I operate on this antenna which are 80, 40, 30.  I use a 5-band hex 
beam for the other bands.

But, I can easily get a good match well under 1.5:1 using the AT1KM.  But, I 
also measured the impedance and SWR at the point that the coax hooks into the 
AT1KM.   These measures are then of the raw, un-tuned, antenna system (coax and 
delta loop) made with my MFJ-259B.  According to these measurements, the raw 
impedances I need to match are more then 10:1 for some of the bands.  Indeed, I 
am close to 24:1 for the low part of 80 but I operate fine in this region using 
the AT1KM.

Should I then assume that the KAT500 will not work for me with my current 
antenna system?  I also noticed that other auto-tuners have similar wider 
ranges.  For example, MFJ-998 supports a matching range of 12 to 1600; and, the 
old Palstar AT-Auto supports a matching range of 15 to 1500 (now Kessler 
Engineering).  Apparently, the new the new Palstar HF-Auto is reported as 10:1 
SWR which may be the same as KAT500.

Therefore, can someone (Wayne, Eric or others in the know) confirm that with my 
current antenna configuration, I will probably NOT be able to use the KAT500 
for 80 meters (at least).  My options I suppose are not to use the KAT500 at 
all, not use it for 80, or reconfigure my delta loop (although, my degrees of 
freedom for this are small).

73, phil, K7PEH

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Reply via email to