If the adjustment allows half steps, e.g. 0, 0.5, 1, ... 8.5, 9; then you would have about as many steps and still have some vague relation to S units.
Cheers - Bill, AE6JV On 5/12/12 at 5:43, drew...@verizon.net (drewko) wrote: >Possible minor feature suggestion: I was thinking that it would be >convenient to have the Threshold numbers coorespond directly to the >meter S-units (i.e., a threshold adjustment range of 0 to 9). But I'm >uncertain if I'd want to give up the finer granularity of the current >0-20 range for the ability to directly set the AGC point according to >the s-meter. I guess I'd have to try it both ways. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Bill Frantz |The nice thing about standards| Periwinkle (408)356-8506 |is there are so many to choose| 16345 Englewood Ave www.pwpconsult.com |from. - Andrew Tanenbaum | Los Gatos, CA 95032 ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
