I support Ian's suggested option. My previous question about using a programmable function is (I now realise) useless (as is using a macro) because they all need a "hold" on a button, and we've already got that!
On 19:59, Ian White GM3SEK wrote: > [snip] > > I was only suggesting ONE new option. > > The existing options are: > > 1. Tap = XFIL, Hold = DUAL PB (the current default, and no reason to > change that status) > > 2. Tap = XFIL, Hold = APF (the only current alternative) > > My simple suggestion, for those who use APF a lot but don't use XFIL, > was: > > 3. Tap = APF, Hold = DUAL PB > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
