It might also be interesting to see what happens to the "noise pedestal" when audio is added to the equation.
73, Scott, N9AA On 9/22/12 6:31 PM, Don Wilhelm wrote: > Gary, > > Joe did testing on a sample size of one K3. While manufacturing of K3s > can produce units that behave close to the average, I think it would be > wise to test on a greater number of K3s with different configurations. > In addition some testing of K3s under fault conditions should be done too. > > 73, > Don W3FPR > > On 9/22/2012 6:13 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: >> *Joe, >> >> Thanks for taking the time to conduct the tests. >> >> Now that I understand what the rationale for the request to Wayne, I am of >> the same mind also. >> >> As I use the FM filter rarely I would also be able to free up a filter slot >> and add an additional narrow filter which would be good for me also. >> >> I hope Wayne will give consideration to your request in light of your >> testing and implement it soon. >> >> Thanks again Joe for the test results and the reasoning for the request. >> >> 73 >> * >> On 23 September 2012 08:02, Thomas Horsten <tho...@horsten.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Joe, >>> >>> Thanks for that analysis! It makes the situation clear to me: The FM filter >>> will do just fine for AM and ESSB, and I can free up a filter slot for a >>> narrow CW filter. >>> > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html