It might also be interesting to see what happens to the "noise pedestal" 
when audio is added to the equation.

73,
Scott, N9AA


On 9/22/12 6:31 PM, Don Wilhelm wrote:
> Gary,
>
> Joe did testing on a sample size of one K3.  While manufacturing of K3s
> can produce units that behave close to the average, I think it would be
> wise to test on a greater number of K3s with different configurations.
> In addition some testing of K3s under fault conditions should be done too.
>
> 73,
> Don W3FPR
>
> On 9/22/2012 6:13 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> *Joe,
>>
>> Thanks for taking the time to conduct the tests.
>>
>> Now that I understand what the rationale for the request to Wayne, I am of
>> the same mind also.
>>
>> As I use the FM filter rarely I would also be able to free up a filter slot
>> and add an additional narrow filter which would be good for me also.
>>
>> I hope Wayne will give consideration to your request in light of your
>> testing and implement it soon.
>>
>> Thanks again Joe for the test results and the reasoning for the request.
>>
>> 73
>> *
>> On 23 September 2012 08:02, Thomas Horsten <tho...@horsten.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Joe,
>>>
>>> Thanks for that analysis! It makes the situation clear to me: The FM filter
>>> will do just fine for AM and ESSB, and I can free up a filter slot for a
>>> narrow CW filter.
>>>
>
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Reply via email to