Hi Moe,
In my search for information on X39 flux, I found (via Google) some
information from Rapid Electronics which also descripes Crystal 400
and 511. It doesn't appear that there should be any problems with
either of these.
I tried to send you the data directly as an attachment, but was
unable to do so. You can download it from <ftp://n7xy.net/solder.pdf>.
73, Bob N7XY
On Oct 24, 2005, at 11:41 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Bob
Thanks.
I just want to make sure it doesn't give trouble later.
I am using crystal400 halide free.
Actually , I was using crystal 511 multicore for various things
and seems to
be OK.
Just I want my K2 to last all my life or may be most of my life.
Moe
MM0MRM
On Saturday 22 October 2005 18:33, you wrote:
On Oct 22, 2005, at 1:55 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Tom
I already built control and front panal board using crystal 400.
Is 370 flux no clean or usual Rosin core?
Multicore web site Loctite is quite useless for older tech info.
thanks for your help.
The Loctite web site is useless for practically anything. However, a
Google search turned up the following site, which mentions Multicore
370 as being an activated rosin core flux.
http://www.logwell.com/tech/servtips/solder.html
FWIW, I built my K2 with Multicore 63/37 type X39C, which was lobeled
as 'no-clean' but I have been unable to find any definitive data for
this, although it behaved similar to other mildly-activated fluxes.
It didn't seem to be any more difficult to solder than with more
active flux, although there was little residue, as expected.
Bob N7XY
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
