My KX3 seems to be better than my K2. When you narrow the filter down on a weak station with the KX3, the signal seems to pop up out of the noise better than it does at narrow widths on the K2. I haven't found the APF function of the KX3 to be very helpful to me, but others seem to have found differently.
Part of the difference may be lie in the ability of the KX3 to squeeze down to a much narrower filter width than the K2. Even at wider filter settings the KX3 is easier for me to listen to however. Chip AE5KA On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 9:38 AM, dw <bw...@fastmail.fm> wrote: > Hi All, > For those of you who are familiar with the K2, K3 and KX3, I'm > interested in your experiences with comparing those receivers ability to > pull week cw signals out of the mud for long-distance qso-ing. > > Specifically have you found features in the K3 and/or KX3 that > out-perform the K2 for that type of cw operation? > > Thanks in advance. > Duane - N1BBR > > > > -- > bw...@fastmail.net > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
