I suspect that VSWR tests should be done with constant carrier CW, and not with 
a fluctuating signal as SSB. 

Sent from my iPhone
...nr4c. bill


> On Apr 10, 2014, at 4:26 PM, Mark Petiford <rv6am...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> Re:  Can you redo the 1-2-1-2 test with FM?
> 
> I just duplicated the original test with my KX3 (FW 1.94/1.28) and got the 
> same results.  I repeated the "1-2-1-2" voice test and the SWR remained 
> stable as it did in AM as well. 
> 
> It looks almost like the KX3 is calculating the SWR using a good current 
> value for forward power (dropping off to zero as the voice trails off between 
> syllables or words) but using a stale value (not updated often enough) for 
> reflected power.  When the forward power goes to zero or near zero as it does 
> on SSB between syllables, it doesn't take much reflected power to give you 
> the appearance of high SWR if you are using a stale reflected power value.  
> In AM and FM, the carries remains relatively high stabilizing the calculation 
> by never letting forward power drop to, or near, zero between voice 
> syllables.  
> 
> Of course, it could also be related to the time constants in the hardware, 
> but now I am speculating too much...and being a hardware guy, I love to blame 
> things on the software guys!  ;-)
> 
> Mark
> KE6BB
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to n...@widomaker.com
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to