Bill,

You're correct. It feeds on itself. But consider that you sent your post from a linux computer. Is linux only 2% if you include tablets and phones? Android is the leader in smart phones by a wide margin - and Android is linux.

Windows is losing ground rapidly. Windows 8 was an *attempt* to regain some traction in the tablet and phone market. But only an attempt.

Now back to our regularly scheduled program.

With the correct libs installed, the linux-based Elecraft Utilities work just fine. So does fldigi. Running Mint 16 Cinnamon on an Intel NUC with a 1.2 Ghz Celeron screwed onto the back of my monitor, I have an excellent radio desk computer. I'm not sure I could find a simpler user interface than Cinnamon.

73, Doug -- K0DXV

On 5/27/2014 6:29 PM, Bruce Beford wrote:
I don't believe people load Linux just so they can spend time getting a 
computer to run Elecraft utilities. The use of Linux appears to be more of a 
philosophical endeavor than a strictly performance one. It's not too often that 
I hear someone say that they run Linux because they can't get a similar app on 
Windows.

Windows runs on around 90% of the worlds desktops and laptops. OSX something 
less than 9%, Linux (all distros) less than 2%. One of the reason for Window's 
dominance is the (generally) simplified user experience, coupled with the broad 
software/comparable hardware availability. The two sides feed on and promote 
each other. i.e. a larger installed base of OS users makes for an attractive 
market for software/hardware creators. Of course, it also makes it a fertile 
hunting ground for malware creators, too...

(My only post in this thread...)
Bruce N1RX



Sent from my ASUS Pad

Bill W2BLC <w2...@nycap.rr.com> wrote:

I really have to chuckle regarding all the various "simple" steps the
Linux users go through to get their computers to speak to the K3. I have
one machine set up for Linux - although I am not really sure why.
Everything I do using a computer is so much easier on Windows -
including control of all the parts of my K-Line. Download, install, and
use - it doesn't get much simpler than that.

It took me over an hour to get a simple WiFi printer operating on Linux
Mint 17 this afternoon (driver issues). Took me less than five minutes
on the Win 8.1 machine. I use a network for my printers and all the
computers share the same printers - Windows and Linux.

Having said all that, I cannot imagine spending a bunch of time getting
Linux up and running with the K-Line software much less having faith in
its ability to correctly operate/update the K-Line.

I am not trolling, I really would like an honest answer as to why Linux
is chosen over Windows for similar operations. I play with Linux and
work with Windows. I have been dealing with computers and software
design since the late 1970s - so I am not living in a cave.

If you reply to my question - and all you are going to do is take me to
the woodshed, then kindly don't bother.

Bill W2BLC K-Line

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to bef...@myfairpoint.net

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to k0...@aol.com


______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to