Wes;

We do realize the situation as far as Auxbus is concerned with an unpowered 
KAT500. I believe that Wayne has stated that he has an active task to allow the 
K3 to detect the situation and recover from it.
I don’t know the time frame of this fix. I’ll let him comment further when he 
gets a chance.

Jack B, W6FB


> 
> On Oct 4, 2014, at 10:27 PM, Wes (N7WS) <w...@triconet.org> wrote:
> 
> Jack,
> 
> Thanks for your remarks.
> 
> I will be using AUX Bus interconnects, however, the KPA500 has yet to be 
> assembled and frankly the Elecraft cables are too spendy so they are coming 
> from elsewhere.
> 
> I don't use a P3 (an SDR-IQ is my preference) so the 12V spigot is available. 
> However, using that port to power a relay is going in the wrong direction for 
> me. I'd like to reduce the mess of cables and needing one more from the 
> desktop to the supply underneath was what I wanted to avoid. I've just had to 
> add a Rigrunner to power more devices in my "wireless" station.
> 
> 'Tis a pity that the KAT500 can't treat the bus like the KRC-2 and KPA500.
> 
> Wes N7WS
> 
> 
> On 10/4/2014 7:20 PM, Jack Brindle wrote:
>> Godo questions. The power sequencing key is that the KAT500 must be powered 
>> before the K3 initializes the Auxbus. You actually have a little bit of time 
>> after the K3 powers on before this happens, and the KAT500 powers up quickly 
>> to wait for this activity, so if you were able to power the KAT500 from the 
>> K3’s power jack, it will work just fine. I do this in my own station by 
>> powering a relay from the K3. The relay then switches power to the remaining 
>> peripherals, including my KAT500, K3  and  KRC2. I can’t answer the question 
>> as to whether the upgraded K3 can directly power a KAT500 - my own has not 
>> been upgraded and with the power setup I have I don’t need it.
>> 
>> As for the KRC2, we have not seen any problem of this sort so far (and it 
>> has been a long time…). The KRC2’s Auxbus circuitry is slightly different 
>> from the KAT500, which seems to allow it. Before anyone asks, the KPA500 
>> does not have this problem at all. It only transmits on the Auxbus, and the 
>> isolation driver transistor it uses very effectively prevents any problem.
>> 
>> As for the interconnect, I highly recommend using the Auxbus connection, 
>> especially if a KPA500 is in use. When properly configured, the three 
>> devices work very well together to provide an excellent user experience. To 
>> borrow a phrase, they just work.
>> 
>> 73!
>> 
>> Jack B, W6FB
>> 
>> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to jackbrin...@me.com

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to