Joe,
I agree with the last sentence. From my perspective (never use
diversity) diversity got in the way and thus what the bad actor. Thus it
ought to be relocated.
It depends upon how you operate.
Making something available as a programmable function doesn't mean one
has some programmable button left to place it on.
On 2/15/2015 15:07 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
On 2015-02-15 9:55 AM, brian wrote:
Question: does anybody really use XFIL?
Perhaps relocation of diversity there makes more sense.
No, retaining the dual context CW filter and assigning APF to XFIL
and Dual PB to the current DUAL PB function makes more sense.
Leave DIV as SUB Hold as it is in 5.10 and make LINK available
as a programmable function (LN0;/LN1;). Having LINK as SUB
HOLD and DIV as an extra long hold is/was very difficult from
an ergonomic perspective.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to als...@nc.rr.com
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2015.0.5646 / Virus Database: 4284/9117 - Release Date: 02/15/15
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
