This is a thread from June 2013 that was closed by Eric --  in 2013. What
gives?

Joe N1QD

On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Jim Brown <j...@audiosystemsgroup.com>
wrote:

> On Sun,3/8/2015 8:47 PM, Wes (N7WS) wrote:
>
>> Has anyone other than me ever noted that Rob Sherwood doesn't own a K3?
>> His #1 operating position has an IC781 and #2 is a TS-990.
>>
>
> Here's part of an exchange re: the "obvious superiority" of the new
> generation of Flex radios. The initial comments are from Howard, VE3GFW,
> ex-KY6LA, who doesn't operate much, "hates CW," and loves SDRs.
>
> > FYI. here is a comment from one of the most accomplished RF engineers
> > I know.. Michelle Easton W5NYV...
> >
> > Frankly I have to agree with her.. why are you and Dennis so stuck
> > back in the 20^th Century trying to keep legacy technology alive when
> > SDR's are now the new baseline> I'm just amazed this is even still being
> debated.
> >
> > Thanks for including me in all of these conversations, it's certainly
> > illuminating. I must live in a bubble, because my tech circle assumes
> > SDRs as a baseline.
> >
> > -Michelle W5NYV
>
> I responded:
>
> Michelle may be a great engineer, but few of us know everything there is to
> know about everything.  Does she OPERATE HF?  Does she know what HF
> operators need?  Does she design stuff with Pin One Problems?  Does she
> know
> what a Pin One Problem is? Do YOU?  What kind of operating do YOU do?
>
> I don't give a rat's ass about "new technologies" and the latest fads.
> I am both an engineer and an OPERATOR. I choose a radio that gives me the
> performance and the functions I need, and at a price I can afford.
> The K3s are my current choice. It is NOT a religious decision. Before that
> it was FT1000MPs, before that TS850s, before that a K2.  Based on what I
> see
> of the performance and features of the current crop of SDRs, none are even
> close to offering what the K3 does. Someday that will change, and when it
> does, I may buy one -- if I'm not in hospice by then.
>
> I drive a big Toyota SUV because I need to haul stuff. I convinced my wife
> to buy a Prius because she doesn't.  I have a modest music listening
> system,
> but a monster library of music on LP, CD, and DVD. As last count, >3,000
> LPs, >4,000 CDs, and about 150 DVDs. I worked in pro audio, and for most of
> my professional life, people asked me about whatever the latest and
> greatest
> was.  My advice, then and now, is to save their money and buy music by
> Prez,
> Billie, Pops, and Desmond.
>
> It is NOT about technologies.
>
> =   =   =   =   =   =   =
>
> And Michelle responded:
>
> K3s are great.
>
> Any solution in ham radio that makes the operator happy, and therefore
> leads to them being more efficient and achieving higher scores, is the
> optimum solution, for that ham, for that application. There is an assmption
> here of an objective ideal in terms of operating in contests. I don't think
> this assumption should go unquestioned.
>
> What works for one set of operators is not guaranteed to work for another.
>
> I use SDRs for (non-human-involved) cognitive radio research, and in
> experiments with new modulation schemes, for which they are absolutely
> necessary. I have a Flex, USRPs, boxes of HPSDRs, a BladeRF, a HackRF, and
> about a half dozen other custom boards and implementations in FPGA. I don't
> even consider legacy radios, outside of where I must have a simple cheap
> solution to radio sensor data back home (such as RFID). I'm an SDR zealot.
>
> I prefer the K3 for contesting due to a delightful user interface,
> portability, and durability.
>
> All of these radios under discussion are so far above what I would
> consider to be the performance cutoff for contesting, one should choose
> based on the remaining "highest nail" - the UI, or whatever else the
> situation demands. The Flex is an undisputed lab queen and is objectively
> "the best" in terms of stats. But we took K3s to the Cook Islands and Raro.
> If I go on another DXpedition, it probably won't be with a Flex. Not that
> I'm generally choosing - I'm a junior member of the DXpedition teams that
> invite me.
>
> I contest for fun, but I've put in enough hours with the local club to
> know that I'm not rig-limited. I know for a fact that I'd have to contest a
> lot more for the rigs I use to start limiting my scores, instead of my
> skill level limiting my scores. The Flex doesn't make me any better of an
> operator than the K3 or the 756Pro2. They all can have the killer app of
> panoramic display, which I depend upon. They are all easy enough to switch
> bands on. Above that, I'd need to put in so much more seat time in order
> for the Flex to start making a difference, and I just don't have that much
> time to devote to contesting.
>
> I have raced cars. If the objective measurements of transceiver
> performance can be likened to horsepower, then you obviously need a car
> with enough horsepower to compete. But if you pick a car based solely on
> this one axis, then you may end up backing a Corvette that fails to
> negotiate the twisty road, while the half-your-horsepower Porsche eats your
> lunch. Conversely, the Porshe will lose in the straightaway to the
> Corvette. Suspension, gearing, steering, track type, race format - etc. are
> are equivalent in importance to horsepower.
>
> So, If you want to talk about what the best contesting rig is, then I
> think you have to consider radios in a more multidimensional manner than by
> just comparing the equivalent of horsepower. Of which, Flex clearly seems
> to win.
> -Michelle W5NYV
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to joseph.a.har...@gmail.com
>



-- 
Joe Harris, N1QD
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to