Just make sure you get one that can handle line level inputs, or you'll
have to build an attenuator....
73, Ross N4RP
On 6/9/2015 5:45 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
In addition to the sound cards recommended in the K9YC document,
these have been reported to be solid performing cards:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16829128010 ($36)
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16829126101 ($18)
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16829126101 ($40)
That list is not exhaustive - it does not include many of the <$100
cards being recommended for SDR use or many of the <$10 "dongles" that
work exceedingly well for simple audio I/O purposes.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
On 2015-06-09 5:16 PM, David Ahrendts wrote:
Gentlemen, suggest some alternatives to the SignalLink USB for
digital. Would like to research.
David A., KC0XT
On Jun 9, 2015, at 2:10 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV <li...@subich.com> wrote:
I think there is one point that is overlooked in a lot of these
discussions. It really doesn't take much of a sound card to do
digital signal processing on 3 KHz or less audio streram.
There are a significant number of reports concerning the issues with
Signalink on-line if one bothers to look. In general they relate to
improper filtering of the USB +5V power, lack of a regulator for the
V/2 reference to the sound codec (analog to digital converter), lack
of proper bypassing of noise from the various chips, requirement that
the digital to analog converter be run at too high a level in order
for the "VOX" to trigger reliably, etc.
In general, this means Signalink loses 15 dB or more of signal to
noise ratio (which is a big deal with modes like JT65 and JT9 on HF)
on the receive side and is much more "dirty" (often with multiple
audio signals) on transmit.
You're correct that it does not take much of a sound card to decode
some signals. However, the Signalink "sound card" contains most of
the same components as the generic USB sound products that perform
much better - yet Signalink costs two to three times as much.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
On 2015-06-09 3:59 PM, Barry LaZar wrote:
Joe,
You bring an interesting point of view. I've been using a
SignaLink
USB for at least 3-4 years. I haven't had an issue with it except not
enough time to play. And, I can't blame the manufacturer for that.
I think there is one point that is overlooked in a lot of these
discussions. It really doesn't take much of a sound card to do digital
signal processing on 3 KHz or less audio streram. However, I would
never
use a card in my laptop or my I/F for some of the heavier lifting here
in my shack where I need 96KHz sample rates or better with 24 bit
digitizing. But for just hook it up, set the levels and go, an
interface
with a built in sound card is not a bad way to go. In many cases,
it is
just easier to do and it allows for more flexibility.
73,
Barry
K3NDM
On 6/9/2015 3:11 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
On 2015-06-09 12:02 PM, Bob N3MNT wrote:
OP said computer did not have an audio input.
He's still better off with an external USB sound card of reasonable
quality and a pair of audio cables than using the Tigertronix product
of dubious quality and well documented poor design. A simple USB
sound
card of reasonable quality will cost 1/3 to 1/2 as much as the
inferior
"amateur" product.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to k3...@comcast.net
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to li...@subich.com
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to davidahren...@me.com
David Ahrendts davidahren...@me.com
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to n...@n4rp.com
--
FCC Section 97.313(a) “At all times, an amateur station must use the minimum
transmitter power necessary to carry out the desired communications.”
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
