Since Sherwood's Dynamic Range Narrow Spaced measurement is of great interest to CW operators, it only makes sense to make the measurement using a CW filter, optional or not. The measurement would be meaningless to CW operators if made using the stock sideband filter.
73, Bill - NA5DX On 7/25/2015 1:47 PM, elecraft-requ...@mailman.qth.net wrote:
Message: 27 Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 11:04:20 -0700 (MST) From: XE3/K5ENS via Elecraft<elecraft@mailman.qth.net> To:elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] 200 Hz 5-pole filter Message-ID:<1437847460881-7605322.p...@n2.nabble.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Apples and oranges. The K3 is still no 2 with the 200 Hz 5-pole filter. You just can no longer buy the radio with that filter. I have always found it a little strange that Sherwood never stated that the filters used in his test were optional on the K3? If the K3 was tested with the stock filter it may make it into the top 10. Don't get me wrong I have a K3S on order. I'm just looking at the data
______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
