When I built my K2 a year and a half ago, I also had to decide between bare K2 
vs KAF2 vs KDSP2, and went through the archives. In the end I went with the 
KDSP2, but some of the points I considered along the way:

Bare K2:
- built-in IF filters do work very well, but I read some reports that strong 
stations nearby can produce some « blow-by », and that either the KAF2 or KDSP2 
can help clean it up.
- At some point, Elecraft may cease production of the K2, and if I leave my K2 
bare, I may not get the chance to upgrade it later.

KAF2:
- cheap, very easy to use
- for CW, reports seem to indicate it performs about the same as the KDSP2
- has a nice LPF stage that cuts down background hiss, seems to be better than 
the KDSP2 in this regard. Some people have added a KAF2-style LPF to their 
KDSP2 with good results.

KDSP2:
- much more configurable than KAF2
- has noise reduction feature, I thought this might come in handy if I have the 
K2 as a second radio, and have it sitting on my club’s SSB calling frequency. 
It does keep the radio very quiet, almost like a voice squelch.
- also has automatic notch filter, in case I need it
- can go very narrow. I had good experiences with the DSP filtering in my KX3, 
which was really effective in digging out some very weak sigs on our QRP net 
(although so far I have mainly used the K2 for rag chewing, haven’t really done 
any side-by-side comparisons with KX3)
- Code for the DSP is open source, so might be fun to play with. However, I 
think the development kits are now out of production, and I think maybe the 
chip in my KDSP2 was not in a socket, but soldered directly to the board 
(someone correct me if I am wrong). So, there are some barriers to playing with 
the DSP code, and if I wanted to experiment in DSP techniques, a much easier 
way would probably be to use a generic PC with sound card and GNUradio or 
similar development environment.
- KDSP2 chews a lot more power than KAF2, which may be an issue if you like to 
run off batteries. You can disable the KDSP2 through the menu, which 
significantly reduces but doesn’t eliminate the additional power draw. If you 
power-cycle the K2, the disable setting of the KDSP2 is forgotten, and the 
KDSP2 will become active again.
- the KDSP2 is a lot more complicated to use than KAF2. This means you have 
more flexibility, and some people like having lots of settings to play with, so 
it can be a plus. But it can also be a minus as it can be hard to remember how 
to change some of the less commonly adjusted settings. Having said that, the 
defaults on the KDSP2 are usually fine. 

So, is the KDSP2 a worthwhile upgrade? For your SSB friend, I would say yes. 
For a primarily CW operator like yourself who already has a KAF2, it might be 
harder to justify. Is the upgrade cost-effective? Well, the KDSP2 is 
significantly more expensive than the KAF2, and it is a personal choice whether 
the extra value/fun brought by the KDSP2’s additional features warrants the 
additional cost. After all, it is a hobby :-)

-- 
73 de Matt VK2RQ

On 5 novembre 2015 at 10:44:52 AM, David Inger (ingerassocia...@cox.net) wrote:

A friend has a fairly recent K2 with the KAF2 audio filter option. He asked  
me to remove the KAF2, build the KDSP2 board and install it in his K2. This  
got me to thinking: I also have a K2 wiht the KAF2 installed. My friend  
works mainly SSB; I work main CW and digital modes. Is the DSP board a  
significant improvement over the bare K2 or even with the KAF2 installed  
(which seems to be tailored for CW reception)? In general, radios that I  
have owned with AF DSP have been pretty much a disappointment. So is the  
KDSP2 a worthwhile and cost-effective upgrade?  

73 de K6SBA  
David in Santa Barbara, CA  
______________________________________________________________  
Elecraft mailing list  
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft  
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm  
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net  

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net  
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html  
Message delivered to matt.vk...@gmail.com  
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to