I was an engineer, and now a lawyer. I call it "noise". Jeff - kg7hdz
> On Mar 3, 2016, at 2:45 PM, Fred Jensen <k6...@foothill.net> wrote: > > Well, consulting the source [ACP131]: > > QRN? "Are you troubled by static?" > QRN "I am troubled by static" > > QRM? "Are you being interfered with?" > QRM "I am being interfered with" > > I suppose "static" could be "interfering with you" as well as another > station, and much of 75 m in the evening probably classes as "static" > regardless of its source. :-) It's seemed to me that the Q-signals class QRM > as caused by another station and interference from everything else as QRN, > but I'm a retired engineer not a lawyer. Additions to the ICAO/ITU standards > can be found at www.zerobeat.net/drakelist/missingq.html > > 73, > > Fred K6DGW > - Northern California Contest Club > - CU in the Cal QSO Party 1-2 Oct 2016 > - www.cqp.org > >> On 3/3/2016 1:11 PM, Scott Ellington wrote: >>> On 3/3/2016 14:47, Fred Jensen wrote: >>> QRN, not QRM >> I thought QRN was exclusively atmospheric noise. Perhaps we need a new >> Q code for man-made garbage. >> >> 73, >> >> Scott K9MA > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to jtho...@liberty.edu ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
