Then what Jim suggested would use the one button you don't even use. I would use every single one of those new macro slots and more. 73, Ryan AI6DO
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 19:48, Don Wilhelm<donw...@embarqmail.com> wrote: Here is my vote *against* having many macro buttons. There is a problem with remembering which buttons play which macros. A limited number is fine with me, but there is a break-even point when you cannot keep track of them in your head and a 'cheat sheet' is needed. I just don't want to get to the point where that cheat sheet is needed. In general, I prefer to tap out the functions needed on the regular buttons because I can remember what those do. I have only a few occasions when it is helpful to activate a sequence of buttons automatically. The only macro that I use is to go split and up 2. I can remember that one easily. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/26/2016 9:01 PM, Jim Kutsch, KY2D wrote: > I'd find this very useful too. If it was possible to set one of the PF > buttons to a "more macros" feature, then not only 0 through 9 but essentially > every other button and knob could be used to activate a different macro. It > would just be necessary to push the PF key followed by the desired other > button or knob. > > Jim, KY2D > > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to ai...@yahoo.com ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
