With due respect for those who disagree, it's not about us. I consider that the need for a well-crafted Parity Act is NOT ours but a need of our sons and daughters and THEIR sons and daughters, few of whom are parties to the contracts to which onerous and often unconstitutionally vague and broad CC&Rs are attached. If more than 80% of the US population is barred from using truly effective HF antennas, the future of amateur radio is in doubt. As a consequence, inadequacies in our national communications infrastructure could, in the context of a disaster, multiply serious harm to lives and property. As is often the case in the political realm, we'd do well to think a great deal less about ourselves and a great deal more about others.
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:41 AM, Mark Bayern <m...@mlb.net> wrote: > I guess I get to be the guy posting to a closed thread. ouch! > > >>"FWIW, I DO consider this issue VITAL to anyone who lives in a > restricted housing development, which includes a very high percentage of US > hams. > > All of those US hams decided on their own to purchase property in the > restricted area (myself included). I knew what it meant and I'm > willing to 'man up' and abide by the agreement I signed at purchase to > follow the rules. Running to 'daddy' after the fact and claiming it is > VITAL that I be allowed to ignore the rules is not an appropriate > reaction from my POV. If it is that vital don't purchase in such an > area. Sometimes that can be difficult, but sometimes life is > difficult. > > Mark AD5SS > > any responses by email please! > > > > On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Jim Brown <j...@audiosystemsgroup.com> > wrote: > > On 8/10/2017 10:37 AM, G4GNX wrote: > >> > >> I was under the impression that this thread was CLOSED. Please respect > the > >> list owner's wishes. > >> > > Note that I posted 6 hours before it was closed. And I posted again > before > > getting to the email that closed it. > > > > FWIW, I DO consider this issue VITAL to anyone who lives in a restricted > > housing development, which includes a very high percentage of US hams. > I'm > > lucky enough not to be restricted in this manner, but I know a lot of > hams > > who are. > > > > 73, Jim K9YC > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > > Elecraft mailing list > > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > Message delivered to plcm...@gmail.com > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to wbmcca...@gmail.com > -- Bill McCarty This message was NOT sent using my iPhone or anyone else's iPhone. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
